Skip to content


BMC Cancer

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Process quality of decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a structured observational study

  • Pola Hahlweg1Email author,
  • Sarah Didi1,
  • Levente Kriston1,
  • Martin Härter1,
  • Yvonne Nestoriuc2, 3 and
  • Isabelle Scholl1
BMC Cancer201717:772

Received: 8 June 2016

Accepted: 9 November 2017

Published: 17 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
8 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alastair Munro
26 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kristien M A J Tytgat
29 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Pola Hahlweg
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alastair Munro
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
17 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3768-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Schön Klinik Hamburg Eilbek