Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The risk and survival outcome of subsequent primary colorectal cancer after the first primary colorectal cancer: cases from 1973 to 2012

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jiao Yang
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosemary Cress
4 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katrina Spilsbury
2 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jiao Yang
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosemary Cress
10 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katrina Spilsbury
6 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jiao Yang
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jiao Yang
Resubmission - Version 5
24 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
8 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
22 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3765-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement