Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Perceived stigmatization and its impact on quality of life - results from a large register-based study including breast, colon, prostate and lung cancer patients

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
14 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jinming Yu
17 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Limin Wang
1 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jochen Ernst
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jochen Ernst
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jochen Ernst
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jochen Ernst
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
31 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3742-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement