Skip to main content

Table 3 GRADE profile evidence of the included studies

From: Meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 5 cm

Outcome indicator

No. of studies

Quality assessment

No. of patients

Effect

Quality

Importance

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

publication bias

LAP

OPEN

Relative (95% CI)

Absolute

  

Operation time

5

no serious risk of bias

very seriousa

no serious indirectness

seriousb

None

90

86

 

WMD −0.87

(−47.50~47.75)

very low

IMPORTANT

Blood loss

5

no serious risk of bias

serious

no serious indirectnessa

seriousb

None

89

108

 

WMD −34.38

(−79.60~10.84)

very low

IMPORTANT

Postoperative complications

6

no serious risk of bias

no serious inconsistency

no serious indirectness

seriousa

Maybed

185

194

RR 0.65

(0.38~1.12)c

 

low

CRITICAL

Postoperative hospital stay

6

no serious risk of bias

very seriousa

no serious indirectness

seriousb

None

113

122

 

WMD −2.01

(−3.83~ − 0.18)

very low

IMPORTANT

Overall recurrence rate

7

no serious risk of bias

no serious inconsistency

no serious indirectness

seriousa

None

203

214

RR 0.56

(0.29~1.06)c

 

moderate

CRITICAL

Disease-free survival

5

no serious risk of bias

no serious inconsistency

no serious indirectness

no serious imprecision

None

162

171

HR 0.40

(0.17~0.91)

 

moderate

CRITICAL

Overall survival

4

no serious risk of bias

no serious inconsistency

no serious indirectness

serious

None

149

158

HR 0.11

(0.03~0.43)

 

moderate

CRITICAL

  1. LAP laparoscopic resection, OPEN open resection
  2. ahave serious heterogeneity(I 2 > 75%)
  3. bthe sample size of included patients is too small
  4. cthe confidence interval of RR include 1
  5. dexist publication bias