Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 5 cm

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiao Lian
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lesly Dossett
21 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christina Angeles
7 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiao Lian
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lesly Dossett
25 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christina Angeles
30 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiao Lian
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christina Angeles
12 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lesly Dossett
28 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiao Lian
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
30 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xiao Lian
Resubmission - Version 6
30 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
31 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
13 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3741-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement