Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Diagnostic and prognostic value of CEA, CA19–9, AFP and CA125 for early gastric cancer

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Fan Feng
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicole D. Riddle
30 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sevtap Savas
14 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Fan Feng
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sevtap Savas
27 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Fan Feng
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Fan Feng
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Fan Feng
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
30 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3738-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement