This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Oncology practitioners’ perspectives and practice patterns of post-treatment cancer survivorship care in the Asia-Pacific region: results from the STEP study
- Raymond Javan Chan1, 2Email author,
- Patsy Yates1, 2,
- Qiuping Li3,
- Hiroko Komatsu4,
- Violeta Lopez5,
- Myat Thandar6,
- Selva Titus Chacko7,
- Winnie Kwok Wei So8,
- Kanaungnit Pongthavornkamol9,
- Myungsun Yi10,
- Pongpak Pittayapan11,
- Jessica Butcon12,
- David Wyld2,
- Alex Molassiotis13 and
- on behalf of the STEP study collaborators
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 26 March 2017
Accepted: 30 October 2017
Published: 6 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Savitri Singh-Carlson|
|3 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Erin E. Hahn|
|16 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Raymond Chan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12885-017-3733-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.