Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Cancer

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Prospective study of 11C–methionine PET for distinguishing between recurrent brain metastases and radiation necrosis: limitations of diagnostic accuracy and long-term results of salvage treatment

BMC Cancer201717:713

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3702-x

Received: 8 July 2017

Accepted: 22 October 2017

Published: 6 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Jul 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ondrej Kalita
12 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alexander Siebenhuener
22 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Shoji Yomo
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Shoji Yomo
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
22 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3702-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital
(2)
Positron Imaging Center, Aizawa Hospital, 2-5-1, Honjo

Advertisement