This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Men’s perceptions of prostate cancer diagnosis and care: insights from qualitative interviews in Victoria, Australia
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 1 June 2017
Accepted: 22 October 2017
Published: 27 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eimear Ruane-McAteer|
|20 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johana Nayoan|
|7 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Maggie Kirkman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johana Nayoan|
|6 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Maggie Kirkman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|27 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12885-017-3699-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.