Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The relative risk of second primary cancers in Austria’s western states: a retrospective cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Subhojit Dey
16 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sung-Shim Lani Park
22 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Todd M Gibson
23 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Young-Joo Won
10 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Preyer
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Todd M Gibson
17 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Young-Joo Won
18 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sung-Shim Lani Park
12 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Preyer
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Preyer
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Oliver Preyer
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
11 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
24 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3683-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement