Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Cancer

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

In response to Fogarty et al. and why adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy is not recommended routinely

  • Mark B. Pinkham1, 2Email author,
  • Arjun Sahgal3,
  • Andrew P. Pullar1, 4 and
  • Matthew C. Foote1, 2
BMC Cancer201717:768

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3672-z

Received: 28 November 2016

Accepted: 4 October 2017

Published: 15 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ekkasit Tharavichitkul
29 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Riccardo Soffietti
27 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mark Pinkham
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
4 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
15 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3672-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital
(2)
University of Queensland
(3)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto
(4)
Queensland University of Technology

Advertisement