Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Whether intermediate-risk stage 1A, grade 1/2, endometrioid endometrial cancer patients with lesions larger than 2 cm warrant lymph node dissection?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Menghan Zhu
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christa Nagel
1 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sudeshna Chatterjee
19 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Menghan Zhu
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Menghan Zhu
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Menghan Zhu
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Menghan Zhu
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
4 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
23 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3671-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement