Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Cancer

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of programmed death ligand-1 expression in breast cancer: a meta-analysis

BMC Cancer201717:690

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3670-1

Received: 7 July 2016

Accepted: 4 October 2017

Published: 17 October 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Semir Vranic
13 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Veronique Magdalena Neumeister
29 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hye Min Kim
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Semir Vranic
15 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hye Min Kim
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
4 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
17 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3670-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital
(2)
Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine

Advertisement