Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Trends in risk classification and primary therapy of Japanese patients with prostate cancer in Nara urological research and treatment group (NURTG) – comparison between 2004–2006, 2007–2009, and 2010–2012

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charnita Zeigler-Johnson
22 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Masaki Shiota
30 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shinichi Sakamoto
12 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nobumichi Tanaka
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Masaki Shiota
26 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charnita Zeigler-Johnson
1 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shinichi Sakamoto
7 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nobumichi Tanaka
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nobumichi Tanaka
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
2 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3637-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement