Skip to main content

Table 6 Single institution studies examining genotype-directed therapy

From: Comprehensive genomic profiling in routine clinical practice leads to a low rate of benefit from genotype-directed therapy

Study

Number of Subjects

Design

Rate of Actionable Alterations

Rate of Matched Therapy

Rate of Benefita

Current study

126

Retrospective, single institution

92%

12%

2%

Vanderbilt [12]

103

Retrospective, single institution

83%

21%

8%

First MDACC [13]

1144

Prospective, phase 1 study

40%

18%

5%

UCSD [14]

34

Prospective, single institution, molecular tumor board

94%

35%

21%

Cornell [7]

97

Prospective, single institution

94%

5%

2%

Rutgers [15]

92

Prospective, single institution, molecular tumor board

96%

35%

NR

Second MDACCb [16]

339

Prospective, single institution

94%

32%

NR

University of Michigan [17]

500

NR

72%

5–11%

NR

  1. NR not reported
  2. aBenefit defined as partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD)
  3. bSupported by a grant from Foundation Medicine