Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Markus V Heppt
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Watson
14 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ryan Sullivan
14 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Markus V Heppt
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ryan Sullivan
10 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Watson
20 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Markus V Heppt
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Markus V Heppt
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
2 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
10 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement