Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate cox hazards analysis for overall survival in 447 patients with ESCC

From: Prognostic value of pretreatment serum alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) ratio and gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

 

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

Variables

HR

95% CI

p value**

HR

95% CI

p value**

Gender

 Male vs. Female

1.119

0.837–1.497

0.448

0.876

0.679–1.131

0.310

Age (years)

  < 59 vs. ≥ 59

0.985

0.768–1.264

0.905

1.124

0.838–1.506

0.435

Histological differentiation (129)

 Differentiated vs. Undifferentiated

1.242

0.908–1.701

0.176

   

T classification

 T3–4 vs. T1–2

1.851

1.356–2.525

0.000

   

N classification

 Yes vs. No

3.029

2.324–3.948

0.000

   

Metastasis

 Yes vs. No

4.049

2.308–7.103

0.000

   

TNM stage

 III-IV vs. I-II

3.132

2.048–4.074

0.000

2.956

2.269–3.852

0.000

Tumor location

 Upper vs. Middle vs. Lower

1.215

0.984–1.501

0.071

   

Alcohol history

 Yes vs. No

1.346

1.049–1.728

0.020

1.238

0.950–1.612

0.114

Treatment(n)

 Surgery only

1.235

1.063–1.434

0.006

1.083

0.953–1.231

0.221

Surgery and chemotherapy

Surgery and radiotherapy

Surgery and chemotherapy and radiotherapy

Tests

GGT

  ≥ 23.1 vs. <23.1

1.395

1.085–1.793

0.01

1.507

1.163–1.953

0.002

LDH

  ≥ 154.4 vs. <154.4

1.046

0.815–1.344

0.722

   

TBA

  ≥ 4.14 vs. < 4.14

1.172

0.912–1.506

0.215

   

ALT

  ≥ 15.1 vs. < 15.1

0.718

0.558–0.924

0.01

0.913

0.658–1.268

0.588

AST

  ≥ 18.2 vs. <18.2

1.021

0.795–1.312

0.87

   

ALT/AST(LSR)

  ≥ 0.82 vs. <0.82

0.615

0.478–0.792

0.000

0.592

0.457–0.768

0.000

  1. HR Hazard ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval
  2. **Cox hazard regression model