Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics and results of the studies evaluating lymphatic microvessel density prognostic values

From: High lymphatic vessel density and presence of lymphovascular invasion both predict poor prognosis in breast cancer

Author, Year, Country

Size

Age (mean/median, range)

Antibody dilution

Follow-up (month) (mean/median, range)

Cutoff of lymphatic microvessel density

Results

Abe, 2016, Japan [24]

91

54mean (30–81)

D2–40 (1:100)

120median (8–179)

mean

DFS (+), OS (+)

Bono, 2004, UK [17]

180

57median (34–89)

LYVE-1 1 μg/mL

121.2median

median

DFS (+), OS (−)

Gu, 2008, China [19]

61

57.59mean (29–90)

podoplanin (1:25)

48.8mean

median

DFS (+), OS (+)

Mohammed, 2009, UK [21]

177

57median (32–70)

D2–40 (1:100)

96median (2–184)

median

DFS (+), OS (+)

Mylona, 2007, Greece [5]

109

56.89mean (25–86)

D2–40 (1:20)

96.7mean (5–135)

median

DFS (+), OS (+)

Nakamura, 2005, Japan [6]

113

51median (24–87)

podoplanin (1:200)

116median (10–230)

10/mm2

DFS (+), OS (+)

Tsutsui, 2010, Japan [22]

242

58.1mean (23–86)

D2–40 (1:50)

80.64median

10.67/field

DFS (+), OS (−)

van der Schaft, 2007, Netherlands [18]

121

61.4mean

Podoplanin (not given)

80.5mean

median

DFS (+), OS (−)

Zhang, 2008, China [20]

70

49median (30–77)

D2–40 (1:100)

68median (28–83)

median

DFS (+), OS (+)

Zhao, 2012, China [23]

73

53.8mean (29–75)

D2–40 (1:25)

55mean (8–73)

median

DFS (+), OS (+)

  1. DFS disease-free survival, OS overall survival