Strategy | Expected proportion of correctly classified patients | Expected costs | Costs per true-positive case | Proportion of unnecessary EUA indications |
---|---|---|---|---|
Base-case analysis | ||||
EUA | 0.96 | 468 | 7175 | 0.89 |
PET-CT | 0.94 | 1177 | 24,058 | 0.65 |
DW-MRI | 0.93 | 297 | 7588 | 0.40 |
Combined PET-CT and DW-MRI | 0.96 | 1395 | 21,387 | 0.38 |
Test characteristics based on the literature | ||||
PET-CT | 0.94 | 1160 | 22,264 | 0.56 |
DW-MRI | 0.95 | 350 | 6025 | 0.56 |
Sensitivity +10% | ||||
EUA | 0.97 | 468 | 6150 | 0.89 |
PET-CT | 0.96 | 1207 | 18,352 | 0.60 |
DW-MRI | 0.94 | 302 | 6615 | 0.36 |
Combined PET-CT and DW-MRI a | 0.96 | 1395 | 21,387 | 0.38 |
Specificity +10% | ||||
EUA | 0.96 | 468 | 7175 | 0.89 |
PET-CT | 0.94 | 1135 | 23,205 | 0.44 |
DW-MRI | 0.93 | 277 | 7068 | 0 |
Combined PET-CT and DW-MRI | 0.96 | 1364 | 20,919 | 0 |
Sensitivity −10% | ||||
EUA | 0.95 | 468 | 8610 | 0.89 |
PET-CT | 0.93 | 1172 | 27,639 | 0.68 |
DW-MRI | 0.92 | 292 | 8950 | 0.44 |
Combined PET-CT and DW-MRI | 0.95 | 1390 | 23,677 | 0.40 |
Specificity −10% | ||||
EUA | 0.87 | 468 | 7175 | 0.89 |
PET-CT | 0.94 | 1218 | 24,910 | 0.75 |
DW-MRI | 0.93 | 339 | 8654 | 0.67 |
Combined PET-CT and DW-MRI | 0.96 | 1437 | 22,027 | 0.59 |
EUA followed by additional tests | ||||
EUA | 0.96 | 574 | 8799 | 0.89 |
PET-CT | 0.94 | 1189 | 24,304 | 0.65 |
DW-MRI | 0.93 | 351 | 8966 | 0.40 |
Increasing the prevalence of residual disease | ||||
EUA | 0.94 | 9834 | 5199 | 0.85 |
PET-CT | 0.92 | 10,554 | 17,599 | 0.56 |
DW-MRI | 0.90 | 9673 | 5696 | 0.32 |
Combined PET-CT and DW-MRI | 0.94 | 10,778 | 15,697 | 0.29 |
Decreasing the prevalence of residual disease | ||||
EUA | 0.98 | 7290 | 15,598 | 0.95 |
PET-CT | 0.97 | 7982 | 51,592 | 0.81 |
DW-MRI | 0.97 | 7103 | 15,655 | 0.61 |
Combined PET-CT and DW-MRI | 0.98 | 8191 | 45,645 | 0.58 |