Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of the quality assessment of included studies using an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies

From: Weight change during chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis

First author, year of publication

Representativeness of sample (2 points)

Loss to follow-up of participants (1 point)

Information about exposure (1 point)

Measurement of outcome (2 points)

Total score

Foltz, 1985 [32]

2

1

1

1

5/6

Heasman, 1985 [33]

2

1

1

1

5/6

Huntington, 1985 [34]

1

0

1

1

3/6

Goodwin, 1988 [35]

2

1

1

1

5/6

Demark-Wahnefried, 1997 [13]

1

1

0

1

3/6

Aslani, 1999 [36]

1

1

1

1

4/6

Goodwin, 1999 [37]

1

1

0

2

4/6

Kutynec, 1999 [38]

2

1

1

1

5/6

Demark-Wahnefried, 2001 [12]

2

1

0

2

5/6

McInnes, 2001 [1]

1

1

0

1

3/6

Del Rio, 2002 [39]

1

1

1

0

3/6

Lankester, 2002 [40]

1

1

0

1

3/6

Freedman, 2004 [7]

1

1

0

2

4/6

Harvie, 2004 [18]

1

1

0

2

4/6

Ingram, 2004 [6]

2

1

1

2

6/6

Kumar, 2004 [41]

2

1

0

1

4/6

Campbell, 2007 [19]

1

1

0

2

4/6

Courneya, 2007 [27]

2

1

0

1

4/6

Makari-Judson, 2007 [20]

2

1

0

1

4/6

Heideman, 2009 [8]

2

1

0

1

4/6

Biglia, 2010

1

1

0

0

2/6

Tredan, 2010 [44]

1

1

0

1

3/6

Basaran, 2011 [45]

1

0

0

1

2/6

Jeon, 2014 [46]

1

1

1

1

4/6

Winkels, 2014 [47]

2

1

1

1

5/6

  1. (1) Representativeness of sample (2 points: extensive information on number of people eligible and included, 1 point: extensive information about recruitment, but not about number of people eligible and included, 0 points: only brief information about recruitment. (2) Loss to follow-up of participants (1 point: information about number lost to follow-up; 0 points: no information about number lost to follow-up). (3) information about exposure (1 point: results are given separate for different chemotherapy regimens, 0 points: results are not separated out for chemotherapy regimens). (4) assessment of the outcome (2 points: measurement protocol for body weight, 1 point: body weight information for chart review or measurement without protocol, 0 points: no information on how body weight was assessed). The rating system scores studies from 0 (low quality) to 6 points (high quality)