Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Iterative sorting reveals CD133+ and CD133- melanoma cells as phenotypically distinct populations

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jun 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vijay Setaluri
27 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mayumi Fujita
1 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Carole Grasso
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arup K. Indra
16 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Carole Grasso
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giuliana Cortese
18 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Carole Grasso
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Carole Grasso
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
2 Sep 2016 Editorially accepted
9 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12885-016-2759-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement