Skip to main content

Table 2 Meta-analysis of VDR Cdx2 polymorphism and prostate cancer risk

From: Role of vitamin D receptor gene Cdx2 and Apa1 polymorphisms in prostate cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

  

Homozygote (AA vs. GG)

Heterozygote (GA vs. GG)

Dominant model (AA + GA vs. GG)

Recessive model (AA vs. GA + GG)

Analysis

N

OR (95 % CI)

P

I2 (%)

OR (95 % CI)

P

I2 (%)

OR (95 % CI)

P

I2 (%)

OR (95 % CI)

P

I2 (%)

Overall

9

1.11 (0.93–1.33)

0.23

32.3

0.97 (0.88–1.06)

0.53

12.9

0.99 (0.91–1.08)

0.80

28.4

1.12 (0.95–1.31)

0.16

17.6

Ethnicity

  Caucasian

6

1.13 (0.92–1.39)

0.23

23.0

0.93 (0.84–1.03)

0.201

0

0.96 (0.88–1.06)

0.45

4.4

1.15 (0.94–1.41)

0.15

16.7

  African American

1

1.80 (0.97–3.32)

0.06

—

1.54 (0.81–2.92)

0.18

—

1.70 (0.94–3.10)

0.08

—

1.26 (0.91–1.75)

0.16

—

  Hispanic White

1

0.49 (0.17–1.36)

0.17

—

0.83 (0.52–1.31)

0.43

—

0.77 (0.50–1.19)

0.24

—

0.52 (0.18–1.43)

0.20

—

  Mixed

1

0.94 (0.58–1.50)

0.80

—

1.15 (0.91–1.44)

0.22

—

1.12 (0.90–1.39)

0.31

—

0.89 (0.56–1.42)

0.64

—

Source of control

  PB

8

1.11 (0.92–1.33)

0.259

40.7

0.95 (0.86–1.04)

0.32

0

0.97 (0.89–1.06)

0.54

23.8

1.12 (0.95–1.32)

0.16

27.7

  HB

1

1.11 (0.93–1.32)

0.686

—

1.26 (0.88–1.80)

0.19

—

1.25 (0.89–1.75)

0.19

—

1.07 (0.52–2.18)

0.85

—

HWE in controls

  Yes

8

1.15 (0.95–1.40)

0.133

34.3 %

0.97 (0.89–1.07)

0.65

22.1

0.99 (0.91–1.09)

0.99

34.6

1.15 (0.97–1.36)

0.09

20.2

  No

1

0.87 (0.54–1.40)

0.58

—

0.91 (0.69–1.21)

0.53

—

0.90 (0.69–1.17)

0.46

—

0.90 (0.57–1.43)

0.67

—

  1. P P values for Z test, OR odds ratio, CI confidence intervals, HB hospital–based studies, PB population-based studies, HWE Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium