Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Predicting clinical outcomes in chordoma patients receiving immunotherapy: a comparison between volumetric segmentation and RECIST

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Oct 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Behrang Amini
20 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vinodh Kumar
21 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Komal Shah
24 Feb 2016 Author responded Author comments - Kathleen Fenerty
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Feb 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Kathleen Fenerty
Resubmission - Version 3
18 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Kathleen Fenerty
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Kathleen Fenerty
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
9 Aug 2016 Editorially accepted
23 Aug 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12885-016-2699-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement