Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinico-pathological characteristics at primary diagnosis and Asp302His genotype distribution

From: Prognostic relevance of caspase 8 -652 6N InsDel and Asp302His polymorphisms for breast cancer

 

All

CASP8 Asp302His genotype

P-value

Asp/Asp

Asp/His

His/His

n (%)

200

151 (75.5)

46 (23.0)

3 (1.5)

 

Age at diagnosis (years ± SD)

56.46 ± 12.1

57.46 ± 12.0

52.87 ± 11.7

61.33 ± 11.0

0.089

Tumor type

 Ductal

136 (68.0)

109 (80.1)

24 (17.6)

3 (2.2)

0.086

 Lobular

43 (21.5)

29 (67.4)

14 (32.6)

0 (0)

 Others

21 (10.5)

13 (61.9)

8 (38.1)

0 (0)

Tumor size (mm ± SD)

24.20 ± 16.8

23.54 ± 17.4

25.22 ± 14.4

50.00 ± 7.1

0.163

Tumor stage

 pT1

107 (53.5)

84 (78.5)

22 (20.6)

1 (0.9)

0.321

 pT2

71 (35.3)

49 (69.0)

21 (29.6)

1 (1.4)

 pT3+4

22 (11.0)

18 (81.8)

3 (13.6)

1 (6.7)

Lymph node status

 pN0

115 (57.5)

92 (80.0)

22 (19.1)

1 (0.9)

0.202

 pN+

85 (42.5)

59 (69.4)

24 (28.2)

2 (2.4)

UICC stage

 I

76 (38.0)

59 (77.6)

16 (21.1)

1 (1.3)

0.387

 II

78 (39.0)

58 (74.4)

20 (25.6)

0 (0)

 III + IV

46 (23.0)

34 (73.9)

10 (21.7)

2 (4.3)

Grade

 1

71 (37.4)

56 (78.9)

15 (21.1)

0 (0)

0.459

 2

68 (35.8)

49 (72.1)

18 (26.5)

1 (1.5)

 3

51 (26.8)

38 (74.5)

11 (21.6)

2 (3.9)

Estrogen receptor status

 negative

53 (32.5)

43 (26.4)

10 (6.1)

0 (0)

 

 positive

110 (67.5)

81 (49.7)

27 (16.6)

2 (1.2)

0.402

Her2 status

    

 negative

138 (83.6)

104 (63.0)

32 (19.4)

2 (1.2)

 

 positive

27 (16.4)

21 (12.7)

6 (3.6)

0 (0)

0.811

Treatment

 Surgical treatment

  breast conserving

50 (25.0)

41 (82.0)

8 (16.0)

1 (2.0)

0.300

  ablative

150 (75.0)

110 (73.3)

38 (25.3)

2 (1.3)

 

 Adjuvant therapy

     

  no adjuvant therapy

112 (56.0)

90 (80.4)

21 (18.8)

1 (0.9)

0.065

  Tam and/or CMF

88 (44.0)

61 (69.3)

25 (28.4)

2 (2.3)

 

Tam and/or CMF

88 (44.0)

61 (69.3)

25 (28.4)

2 (2.3)

 
  1. Tam Tamoxifen, CMF cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5 fluorouracil. Data are numbers with percentages given in brackets. Categorical variables were analyzed by χ2 statistics. P values were calculated using ANOVA for continuous variables