Skip to main content
Download PDF

PIK3CA dependence and sensitivity to therapeutic targeting in urothelial carcinoma

BMC Cancer volume 16, Article number: 553 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Many urothelial carcinomas (UC) contain activating PIK3CA mutations. In telomerase-immortalized normal urothelial cells (TERT-NHUC), ectopic expression of mutant PIK3CA induces PI3K pathway activation, cell proliferation and cell migration. However, it is not clear whether advanced UC tumors are PIK3CA-dependent and whether PI3K pathway inhibition is a good therapeutic option in such cases.

Methods

We used retrovirus-mediated delivery of shRNA to knock down mutant PIK3CA in UC cell lines and assessed effects on pathway activation, cell proliferation, migration and tumorigenicity. The effect of the class I PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 was assessed in a panel of UC cell lines with a range of known molecular alterations in the PI3K pathway.

Results

Specific knockdown of PIK3CA inhibited proliferation, migration, anchorage-independent growth and in vivo tumor growth of cells with PIK3CA mutations. Sensitivity to GDC-0941 was dependent on hotspot PIK3CA mutation status. Cells with rare PIK3CA mutations and co-occurring TSC1 or PTEN mutations were less sensitive. Furthermore, downstream PI3K pathway alterations in TSC1 or PTEN or co-occurring AKT1 and RAS gene mutations were associated with GDC-0941 resistance.

Conclusions

Mutant PIK3CA is a potent oncogenic driver in many UC cell lines and may represent a valuable therapeutic target in advanced bladder cancer.

Peer Review reports

Background

Advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder has a poor prognosis. At presentation, 15–30 % of UC patients are diagnosed with muscle-invasive tumors, and these carry a 5-year risk of death ranging from 33 to 73 % [1]. The standard treatment for localized invasive UC, is surgical removal of the bladder and regional lymph nodes, but metastatic disease is a major cause of death in these patients. The addition of cisplatin-containing combination neoadjuvant therapy has been shown to improve outcomes following cystectomy [2, 3], but metastasis remains common and although treatment with cisplatin-containing chemotherapy is beneficial in some cases, median survival for metastatic UC is only 13–15 months. As no significant improvements in survival have been achieved in recent years, new approaches to therapy, particularly second line therapies for metastatic disease, are urgently needed. Detailed molecular information on UC is now available [4, 5], but targeted agents have not yet been widely applied [6].

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway plays a critical role in regulation of cell metabolism, migration, proliferation and survival [7] and mutations that lead to aberrant activation of the pathway are found in virtually all types of cancer. In bladder cancer, 50–70 % of tumors contain mutations that are predicted to activate this pathway. These include activating mutations in PIK3CA, [8, 9] and AKT1 [10], and inactivating mutations of PTEN [11, 12], PIK3R1 [13], TSC1 and TSC2 [9, 14]. Assessment of the phosphorylation status of key pathway proteins confirms that pathway activation is present in bladder tumors of all grades and stages [15]. These tumors may benefit from PI3K-targeted therapy. Clinical trials of mTORC1 inhibitors in patients with bladder cancer have been initiated in recent years. In trials of the mTOR inhibitor Evirolimus, exceptional responses have been reported in patients with advanced UC whose tumors contained TSC1 or mTOR mutations [16, 17]. In general however, responses to mTOR inhibitors have not been impressive [18], and indeed not all UC patients with tumors containing TSC1 mutations have shown responses [16]. A potential reason is that mTOR inhibition triggers feedback loops that activate AKT [19]. Inhibitors of AKT have therefore been examined in preclinical studies of UC [20, 21]. Importantly, these studies revealed that sensitivity to AKT inhibition was strongly related to the presence of PIK3CA mutation. Taken together, it is clear that a thorough understanding of the signaling events initiated by the PI3K pathway is required in order to maximize clinical benefit.

Inhibition of PI3K as a potential therapeutic approach in UC has not previously been examined, though mutations in PIK3CA represent the most frequent PI3K pathway mutations in this cancer type, including 12–20 % of muscle-invasive tumors [14, 22]. Preclinical studies and early clinical trials indicate sensitivity to inhibitors of PI3K in several cancers including breast, ovarian, endometrial, lung and multiple myeloma [18, 23–29]. The majority of these studies highlight the Class 1 PI3K inhibitor, GDC-0941, as a good therapeutic drug for solid tumors. Furthermore, a phase I dose-escalation study of GDC-0941 has recently been completed and reports good tolerability of the drug with confirmed target modulation in tumor tissues [30]. Several studies in non-bladder cell lines have sought predictive biomarkers of sensitivity to PI3K inhibitors and it has been suggested that mutation of PIK3CA or loss of PTEN function are related to sensitivity to inhibitors of class I PI3K and that mutations in RAS genes are associated with resistance (Reviewed in [31]), though prediction based on these biomarkers is not absolute.

Previously we examined the effect of ectopic expression of mutant PIK3CA in telomerase-immortalized normal human urothelial cells (TERT-NHUC) and showed that this induces cell proliferation and migration [32]. In bladder tumors, more than one lesion in the PI3K pathway is commonly present [9] and this could potentially lead to distinct types of pathway dependence and response to specific therapeutic agents. Therefore, we have examined the consequences of specific inhibition of mutant PIK3CA in UC cells using stable knockdown, and treatment of a panel of UC cell lines containing a range of PI3K pathway alterations with the class I PI3K inhibitor, GDC-0941. Our findings strongly suggest that targeting of PIK3CA maybe a valid therapeutic approach in advanced bladder cancer.

Methods

Cell culture

Cell lines with known PI3K pathway mutation status were chosen (Additional file 1). Cell lines used for gene knockdown and functional studies were VM-CUB-3, BFTC909 and 253J. VM-CUB-3 was established from a primary human bladder transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), the grade and stage of which are unknown [33]. BFTC909 was established from the sarcomatoid component of a grade 3 TCC of the renal pelvis [34]. 253J was established from a retroperitoneal metastasis from a human TCC [35]. Bladder cancer cell lines J82, 253J, HT-1197, VM-CUB-3, BFTC909, UM-UC3, KU-19-19, DSH1, VM-CUB-1, CAL29, TCCSUP, MGH-U3, 639V, 97-1, LUCC1, LUCC3 and RT4 were used in drug sensitivity assays. Cell line identity was verified by short tandem repeat DNA typing using the Powerplex 16 kit (Promega). Profiles were compared to publically available data (ATCC, DSMZ) or where no reference profile was available, were confirmed as unique. Cells were grown in standard growth media; Hams F12 + 1 % FCS + 1 % Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium + 1 μg/ml hydrocortisone + 1x Non-essential amino acids + 2 mM L-glutamine (97-1), MEM + 10 % FCS + 1x Non-essential amino acids + 2 mM L-glutamine (HT-1197, J82, MGH-U3), DMEM + 10 % FCS + 2 mM L-glutamine (VM-CUB-3, VM-CUB-1, TCCSUP, BFTC909, 639V, CAL29, UM-UC3), McCoy’s 5a + 10 % FCS + 2 mM L-glutamine (RT4), 50:50 DMEM and RMPI 1640 + 5 % FCS + 2 mM L-glutamine (253J) and RPMI 1640 + 10 % FCS + 2 mM L-glutamine (DSH1, KU-19-19). Cells were incubated at 37 °C in 5 % CO2. TERT-NHUC [36] were also used and were cultured in Keratinocyte Growth Medium Kit 2 plus supplements (with 90 μl CaCl2). All cells were tested routinely for mycoplasma whilst in culture and before freezing by PCR using PCR Mycoplasma Test Kit I/C (PromoKine PK-CA91-1048) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

shRNA constructs and transduction of cell lines

Two shRNAs targeting PIK3CA were designed (forward oligo 1 5′- gcagaagtatactctgaaatTCAAGAGatttcagagtatacttctgcTTTTTTGGGCC-3′, reverse oligo 1 5′- CAAAAAAgcagaagtatactctgaaatCTCTTGAatttcagagtatacttctgc-3′, forward oligo 2 5′- caggtatctaccatggaggtTCAAGAGacctccatggtagatacctgTTTTTTGGGCC-3′ and reverse oligo 2 5′- CAAAAAAcaggtatctaccatggaggtCTCTTGAacctccatggtagatacctg-3′ according to an algorithm described previously [37, 38]. The sequence in lowercase is complementary to PIK3CA and forms a short-hairpin structure when expressed due to the intervening loop sequence. These, and a non-specific (NS) shRNA, were first cloned into pGEM-U6 puro and then into pRetroSuper-puro (pRS-puro), along with empty pRS-puro vector (control), to generate retroviruses to transduce VM-CUB-3, BFTC909 and 253J cell lines as described previously [37].

Western blotting

Protein extraction was carried out as described [39] and concentration was quantified using the BIO-RAD protein assay (BIO-RAD, Hemel Hempstead, UK). SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting was carried out as described [32]. Primary antibodies were anti-p110a, anti-pAKT (Ser473), anti-panAKT (Cell Signaling) and anti-tubulin alpha (AbD Serotec). Bound primary antibodies were detected using HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and Luminata Forte Western HRP Substrate (Millipore).

Phenotypic assays

Proliferation, anchorage-independent growth, and Transwell migration assays were carried out and analyzed as described previously [32]. All assays were done in triplicate and repeated at least three times.

Xenografts

Xenografts were established in mice by subcutaneous inoculation of VM-CUB-3 cells with PIK3CA knockdown and control cells (NS shRNA knockdown). Pure strain male BALB/cOlaHsd-Fox1nu mice aged 6 to 8 weeks were used as described [40]. Each cell line was injected subcutaneously into sites on both flanks of 4 mice at a concentration of 1 × 107 cells/site. On day 5 following inoculation, tumor was evident, and tumor volume was then measured frequently using calipers ((a2xb)/2; where a is the smaller and b is the larger diameter of the tumor) up to day 43. Tumor volume is shown in mm3.

Immunohistochemistry

Tumors were formalin-fixed and embedded in paraffin wax. Sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, anti-human Ki-67 proliferation-associated antibody (Dako) and for apoptosis using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) assay (ApopTag Plus Peroxidase In Situ Apoptosis Detection Kit; Chemicon) and analyzed as described previously [40].

GDC-0941 drug treatment

The class I PI3K inhibitor, GDC-0941 (Axon Medchem), was used to treat bladder cancer cell lines and TERT-NHUC. The dose range chosen was based on previous studies that report IC50 values of 0.28–0.95 μM for cell viability of solid tumor cell lines, as well as pharmacokinetic data available from phase I clinical studies that report a maximum of 2 μM GDC-0941 plasma concentration in patients [30, 41]. Cell viability was assessed by CellTiter-Blue® (Promega) analysis of bladder cancer cell lines and TERT-NHUC subjected to GDC-concentrations from 0 to 2 μM. Cell viability was assessed by CellTiter-Blue® (Promega) analysis. 1000–4000 cells per well (number of cells determined to ensure that confluence was not achieved in untreated controls during the experiment) were plated in 96-well plates in five replicate wells and allowed to attach for 24 h before addition of 0–2 μM GDC-0941 in 0.1 % DMSO. After 72 h, 20 μl of CellTiter-Blue solution was added to the medium for 2 h and fluorescence read at 550 nm. Medium alone was used as a blank. Prism software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USE) was used to calculate IC50 values.

Cell cycle and apoptosis analysis of cells cultured with 1 μM GDC-0941 or DMSO only for 48 h was evaluated by flow cytometry as described [40]. All assays were done in triplicate and repeated at least three times.

Statistical analysis

Tumor growth was analysed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Drug IC50 data was analyzed using the Fisher exact test (two-tailed, based on a cut off of >1 and <1 IC50 values) and Student’s t test was used to calculate significance of sensitivity of cells to GDC-0941 relative to PIK3CA wildtype and mutant status. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student’s t-test (unpaired, two-tailed) were also used and P values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Bonferroni method. P < 0.05 was accepted as significant. All tests were conducted using Prism software, except for the Fisher exact test, which was conducted in R for Mac OS X 3.2.1.

Results

Knockdown of mutant PIK3CA in urothelial carcinoma cells reduces PI3K pathway signaling, and transformation-associated phenotypes

Two shRNAs targeting PIK3CA (KD1 and KD2) were designed and validated. These and a non-specific shRNA (NS) and empty vector (control) were retrovirally transduced into the UC cell lines VM-CUB-3, BFTC909 and 253J, all of which have mutations in codon E545 of PIK3CA (E545K in VM-CUB-3 and BFTC909; E545G in 253J), the most commonly mutated codon of PIK3CA in UC, and no known additional PI3K pathway aberrations (Additional file 1) [9, 10, 13, 42]. Following selection of mass populations of resistant cells, p110α protein levels were reduced by 42–92 % (average 69 %) in cells expressing each of the shRNAs (designated PIK3CA-KD) relative to controls and these levels remained constant through sequential cell passages, demonstrating efficient and stable PIK3CA knockdown (Fig. 1a & b).

Fig. 1
figure1

p110α and pAKT protein expression VM-CUB-3, BFTC909 and 253J cells with PIK3CA knockdown. a. Immunoblots showing p110α protein expression in cells transduced with shRNAs targeting PIK3CA (KD1 and KD2), non-specific control shRNA (NS) and control empty vector (C), and levels of phospho(p)AKT (Ser473) as read out of PI3K-AKT pathway activation. Cells were maintained in serum-supplemented conditions. b. Quantification of p110α expression relative to tubulin. c. Quantification of pAKT levels relative to total AKT. Results are representative of triplicate experiments. * indicates statistical significant difference from controls (Adjusted, P < 0.05) according to Student’s t test, adjusted using Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparisons. Values represent mean ± S.E

Full size image

Expression of E545K mutant PIK3CA in TERT-NHUC induces PI3K pathway activation and increases cell proliferation, migration and resistance to anoikis [32]. We tested whether these phenotypes are affected by knockdown of mutant PIK3CA in UC cell lines. In serum-supplemented medium, PIK3CA-KD cells showed significant reduction in phosphorylation of AKT (Ser473) levels relative to controls (33–73 %; mean 53 % reduction, Student’s t test; Adjusted P < 0.05). shRNA KD1 expression had the most profound effect in all 3 cell lines, compatible with it’s more significant effect on PIK3CA expression (Fig. 1a & c).

PIK3CA-KD cells showed significantly reduced proliferation relative to controls (ANOVA test, P < 0.05), with cells expressing KD1 shRNA showing the greatest reduction (Fig. 2a). Annexin V cell staining showed no difference between PIK3CA-KD and control cells, indicating that apoptosis does not make a major contribution to the observed reduction in population growth (data not shown). Furthermore, treatment of PIK3CA-KD VM-CUB-3 cells with hydrogen peroxide in serum-supplemented and serum-depleted medium induced similar apoptotic indices to controls, indicating no change in sensitivity to apoptotic stimuli (data not shown).

Fig. 2
figure2

Proliferation, anchorage-independent growth and motility of bladder tumor cells following PIK3CA knockdown. Analysis of phenotypic consequences of PIK3CA knockdown. Bladder tumor cells with PIK3CA knockdown by shRNAs KD1 and KD2, non-specific control shRNA (NS) and vector control cells (C). a. Proliferation analysis. Cells were plated at 3x104 cells per well in triplicate and counted on the days shown. Y axis is total cell number x 106. Values represent mean ± S.E. Results are representative of triplicate experiments. b. Number of viable BFTC909 colonies with a diameter >50 μm in an area of 2.5 mm2 after 3 weeks of incubation in soft agarose. c. Mean fluorescence of migrated DAPI-stained VM-CUB-3 cells migrating through a Transwell membrane towards a chemoattractant (serum-supplemented medium). Values represent mean ± S.E. Results are representative of triplicate experiments. * indicates statistical significant difference (ANOVA test). Values represent mean ± S.E

Full size image

Anchorage-independent growth was tested in BFTC909 cells, where a significant reduction in colony formation was found for PIK3CA-KD cells compared to controls, with statistical difference for KD1 cells (unpaired t test, P < 0.05) (Fig. 2b). VM-CUB-3 and 253J parental cells do not show measurable anchorage-independent colony formation. Cell migration through Transwell filters towards a chemoattractant (serum) was measured. PIK3CA-KD VM-CUB-3 cells showed a significant reduction in cell migration compared to controls (ANOVA test, P value < 0.001) (Fig. 2c). No significant differences in migration were observed between BFTC909-KD and 253J-KD cells and controls (data not shown). Taken together these results suggest that mutant PIK3CA drives increased proliferation in PIK3CA-mutant urothelial tumor cells, though other phenotypic consequences such as anchorage-independence and increased cell motility are not driven by PIK3CA alone. A summary of the PIK3CA-knockdown induced changes in cellular phenotypes in all the UC cell lines is illustrated in Additional file 2.

Reduced tumorigenicity following knockdown of E545K PIK3CA

VM-CUB-3 cells can produce tumors in vivo in nude mice [43]. We tested the effect of knockdown of mutant PIK3CA expression on growth as subcutaneous xenografts. Independent transductions with the most potent shRNA (KD1) and NS shRNA generated p110α-KD and control cell lines respectively. Following selection of puromycin-resistant cell populations, p110α protein levels (Fig. 3a) and AKT activation (data not shown) were confirmed as described above. Cells were injected subcutaneously. Tumor volume (mm3) was measured from day 5 to day 43. p110α-KD xenografts showed significantly reduced growth rate compared with controls (Mann-Whitney test, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3b). Student t test showed that by day 42, the difference between tumor volume of KD and control xenografts was significantly different (Adjusted P < 0.017; on day 43 P < 0.005).

Fig. 3
figure3

Growth of VM-CUB-3 cells with and without PIK3CA knockdown as xenografts. a. Immunoblot showing p110α protein expression in cells transduced with shRNA targeting PIK3CA (p110 KD) and non-specific control (control). b. 1 × 107 PIK3CA knockdown cells and controls cells were injected into 2 sites each in 4 mice. Tumor volumes are shown in mm3. Difference in volumes of p110 KD and control tumors were statistically significant at 42 days of growth (Student t test, with using Bonferroni’s correction for multiple testing; P < 0.017) and overall after 43 days of growth (Mann-Whitney test, P < 0.05). c. Bar chart illustrates the percentage of Ki67 stained cells counted in 5 areas of each tumor section. * indicates statistical significant difference (ANOVA test, P 0.05). Values represent mean ± S.E

Full size image

No significant differences were identified in tumor histology (data not shown) Sections were stained for Ki67 and TUNEL to assess effects on proliferation and apoptosis, respectively. A significant decrease in the proliferative index of p110α-KD tumors was found (ANOVA test, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3c and Additional file 3) but significant numbers of apoptotic cells were not detected, consistent with in vitro data.

Effects of GDC-0941 on cell viability

The effects of mutant PIK3CA knockdown in UC cells suggest that this is a major driver of transformation in this cell type and that mutant PIK3CA is a good candidate for therapeutic targeting in UC. Therefore we assessed the effect of GDC-0941, a small molecule ATP-competitive inhibitor of class IA PI3K isoforms (α, β, δ), on a panel of UC cell lines and TERT-NHUC. We selected a panel of 17 UC cell lines with known mutation status for PIK3CA, PIK3R1, AKT1, TSC1, PTEN and the three RAS genes [9, 10, 13, 42] (Additional file 1). RNA expression data for PIK3CA, PIK3CB and PIK3CD were available for these and for normal human urothelial cells (Hurst and Knowles, unpublished data). In 13 of 17 lines, expression of PIK3CA was >2-fold higher than in normal urothelial cells. Six of these also showed >2-fold upregulation of PIK3CB. Expression of PIK3CD was >2-fold lower than in normal urothelial cells in all but two cell lines (Additional file 4).

Cells were cultured in 0-2.0 μM GDC-0941 for 72 h and cell viability measured relative to untreated controls. Sensitivity values (IC50) to this compound were within the same range as seen in other cancer cell types [25, 44]. Eight of the 10 cell lines with mutant PIK3CA showed IC50 values from 0.4 μM to 1.25 μM (Fig. 4 and Additional file 5). Six of these eight cell lines have only PIK3CA mutation and 2 harbor additional PIK3R1 (LUCC3) or NRAS Q61R (HT-1197) mutations. Overall cell lines with wild-type PIK3CA were significantly less sensitive to GDC-0941 treatment than mutant PIK3CA cell lines (Fisher exact test, P < 0.05; two-tailed based on a cut off of >1 and <1 IC50 values). Figure 4c clearly illustrates that sensitivity to GDC-0941 is dependent on PIK3CA mutation status (according to an unpaired t test, P value 0.0007). The two cell lines with PIK3CA mutation but minimal response to the drug contained either homozygous deletion of PTEN (J82) or mutation of TSC1 (639V). Furthermore, unlike the more GDC-0941-sensitive cell lines that harbor hotspot PIK3CA mutations, these two lines contain rare PIK3CA mutations (P124L and A1066V), which have been shown previously to be 5 times less potent than hotspot mutants in activating the PI3K pathway [32].

Fig. 4
figure4

Activity of GDC-0941 in relation to PI3K pathway mutational status in bladder cancer cell lines. A panel of 17 bladder cancer cell lines and TERT-NHUC were treated with a range between 0–2 μM of GDC-0941 for 72 h and viability assessed. a. IC50 values shown as mean ± S.E, representative of triplicate experiments. b. Mutation status of cell lines. Grey represents presence of known mutation. c. Dot plot illustrating GDC-094-sensitive cell lines is linked to mutant PIK3CA status (grey and white circles represent mutant and WT PIK3CA cell lines, respectively). d. Immunoblot showing phospho-AKT (upper band) and total AKT (lower band) in cells treated with DMSO (−) or 1 μM GDC-0941 (+) for 1 h

Full size image

TERT-NHUC showed a higher IC50 (~1.5 μM) than cell lines with mutant PIK3CA. Three wildtype PIK3CA cell lines showed similar sensitivities to GDC-0941 treatment as TERT-NHUC. These cell lines harbored a single AKT1 (MGH-U3) or TSC1 (97-1) mutation or both PTEN and RAS mutations (UM-UC3). Four wildtype PIK3CA cell lines (RT4, KU19-19, DSH1 and LUCC1) showed varying degrees of GDC-0941 resistance (<10 % viability reduction at 2 μM), with RT4 (TSC1 mutation) showing extreme resistance. Of these, DSH1 and LUCC1 have loss of PTEN, KU-19-19 has mutant AKT1 and NRAS mutations. Therefore, downstream PI3K pathway alterations in TSC1 or PTEN or co-occurring AKT1 and RAS gene mutations were associated with GDC-0941 resistance.

Phosphorylation of AKT at Ser473 was examined in cell lines treated for 1 h with GDC-0941. Drug treatment reduced AKT phosphorylation to 0.5–7 % of that in untreated controls in all sensitive cell lines (Fig. 4d). Of the resistant cell lines, only LUCC1 (PTEN deleted) exhibited similar levels of pAKT reduction (3 %). Treatment of DSH1 (PTEN deleted) reduced AKT phosphorylation to 24 % of untreated levels. However, treatment of the resistant cell line KU-19-19 had little effect on AKT phosphorylation levels. This may be due to the presence of two mutations in AKT1 (E17K and E49K), which was shown to increase AKT activity in comparison to the single mutant E17K found in the sensitive MGHU3 cell line [10]. Interestingly, no AKT phosphorylation was observable in RT4 under either untreated or GDC-0941-treated conditions, which is in agreement with previous studies [20].

To examine whether GDC-0941 treatment effects were cytostatic or cytotoxic, 8 sensitive cell lines with IC50 values up to 1.2 μM, and TERT-NHUC, were assessed for effects on cell cycle distribution and apoptosis. An increase in the proportion of cells in G1 accompanied by a decrease in S phase was observed in all cell lines except 253J and HT-1197 after 48 h of drug exposure, with the least effect in TCCSUP (Fig. 5a-c). However, only VM-CUB-1 and VM-CUB-3 showed statistically significant differences from TERT-NHUC (t test, P < 0.05). 253J and HT-1197 showed an increased fraction of cells in G2/M (Fig. 5d), which is consistent with the presence of a subset of larger cells. Five cell lines (253J, TCCSUP, VM-CUB-1, BFTC909 and CAL29) showed a significant increase in apoptotic index after 48 h of treatment relative to TERT-NHUC, with the greatest effect in TCCSUP (t test, P < 0.05) (Fig. 6a & b).

Fig. 5
figure5

Flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle effects of GDC-0941 in bladder cancer cell lines and TERT-NHUC. a. Examples of FACS analysis of cells treated with DMSO vehicle (nontreated) or 1 μM GDC-0941 for 48 h. X-axis; DNA content assessed by propidium idodide staining and Y-axis; relative cell number. The legend to the right of each plot shows the percentage of cells in G1, S, and G2/M phase of the cell cycle. b-d. Quantification of replicate cell cycle assays as shown in (a, b). Fold difference of G1. c. Fold difference in S phase. d. Fold difference in G2/M. Values represent mean ± S.E and are representative of quadruplicate experiments. * indicates statistical significant difference (t test, P < 0.05)

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure6

Flow cytometric analysis of apoptotic effects of GDC-0941 in bladder cancer cell lines and TERT-NHUC. a. Examples of FACS Annexin V/PI assay analysis of induction of apoptosis in cells treated with DMSO (nontreated) or 1 μM GDC-0941 for 48 h. X-axis, Annexin V; Y axis, Propidium Iodide (PI). Lower-right quadrant; Annexin V+ and PI- (early apoptotic cell population). b. Quantification of fold difference of early apoptotic cells in population treated with 1 μM GDC-0941 relative to nontreated cells from replicate assays to those shown in A. Values represent mean ± S.E and are representative of quadruplicate experiments. * indicates statistical significant difference (t test, P < 0.05)

Full size image

Discussion

Activating mutations of PIK3CA are found in bladder tumors of all grades and stages. Whilst these are more common in tumors of low grade and stage (26–34 %) they are also found at significant frequency (12–20 %) in advanced UC (> stage T2) [8, 9, 22] (Hurst, Platt, and Knowles, unpublished data), which are commonly treated with systemic therapies and for which novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. Our objective was to examine the effects of specific inhibition of mutant PIK3CA in bladder tumor cells to determine whether mutant PIK3CA can be considered a valid therapeutic target in bladder cancer.

Stable knockdown of mutant E545K/E545G PIK3CA in three UC cell lines reduced PIK3CA protein levels by up to 92 % and was associated with reduced AKT activation, proliferation and in vivo tumor growth. This is consistent with observations reported in colon, gastric and ovarian cancer cell types [45–47], and with our previous data on the effects of expression of mutant PIK3CA in TERT-NHUC [32] and in other cell types [48–50]. Importantly, the intensity of reduction of these phenotypes was linked to the level of PIK3CA protein knockdown and the related reduction in AKT phosphorylation. We only observed inhibition of directional migration in VM-CUB-3 cells, which suggests that additional molecular alterations may contribute to this phenotype. It is possible that invasion may also be affected by PIK3CA and further investigation is warranted to investigate this. It is also important to note that the mice used for the in vivo work were immunodeficient. Whilst the in vivo results show a clear effect, and using immunodeficient mice allows the use of human tumor cells, there is a caveat in that interfering with the PI3K pathway can influence the immune system, and examination in a syngeneic model system could be relevant.

The class IA PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 greatly reduced cell viability of UC cell lines with hotspot PIK3CA mutation status, similar to findings in other preclinical models [25–27, 41, 51]. The two cell lines with rare PIK3CA mutations had minimal response to the drug and contained either homozygous deletion of PTEN (J82) or mutation of TSC1 (639V), suggesting that co-existing PTEN or TSC1 mutations confer some resistance to PI3K inhibition. Cell lines with wildtype PIK3CA were less sensitive or lacked sensitivity to GDC-0941 completely, in agreement with studies in breast cancer, multiple myeloma, lung cancer, and endometrial cancer, where PIK3CA mutations are also frequent [25, 26, 51]. Interestingly, our data support the findings of a study that examined the effect of the pan-AKT inhibitor, MK-2206, on the viability of UC cell lines [20]. Hotspot mutant PIK3CA expressing cell lines, 253J, HT1197 and VMCUB-1 were sensitive to AKT inhibition, whereas cell lines with rare PIK3CA mutations (J82 and 639V) or those with PTEN and RAS gene or TSC1 mutations (UMUC3 and RT4) had IC50 values above 2 μM (classed as resistant).

As reported in several other tumor types, additional information on PI3K pathway mutational status is needed to correctly predict the response to PI3K inhibition. There have been conflicting reports of the effect of PTEN mutation on sensitivity to class I PI3K inhibition. For example, in non-small cell lung carcinoma, endometrioid and breast carcinoma cell lines, PTEN loss of expression or mutation was associated with sensitivity to GDC-0941 [25, 26, 51] but in multiple myeloma cell lines [27], PTEN loss had no predictive value. In the present study, all UC lines with PTEN loss as a single alteration showed resistance. PI3K pathway-dependent cells with mutations in genes that act below PIK3CA in the pathway are predicted to be resistant to PI3K inhibition. Indeed, our data showed that PTEN, AKT1 and TSC1 mutant UC cell lines were less sensitive than those with PIK3CA mutations, and in the case for RT4 (TSC1 mutant), resistant to PI3K inhibition.

Similarly, in some studies RAS mutation has been reported to predict resistance to PI3K inhibition and in others to have no impact on sensitivity [25, 52]. Here we found that HT-1197, which harbors both PIK3CA and NRAS mutations, was sensitive to GDC-0941 but other lines with RAS mutations co-occurring with PTEN or AKT1 mutations were less sensitive. This is likely to be related to relative dependence on RAS-MAPK and PI3K pathways in individual cases. Recent observations have highlighted the effect of context-dependent crosstalk on MEK signaling associated with inhibition of PI3K in breast cancer [53, 54]. Interestingly, a phase I clinical trial of GDC-0941 in solid cancers showed that a melanoma patient with good response had a BRAF mutation and wild-type PIK3CA [30]. As many bladder cancers have alterations that are known to activate the MAPK pathway [4], it is likely that dual MEK and PI3K inhibition may be advantageous. Results from ongoing clinical trials of GDC-0941 in combination with drugs including GDC-0973 (MEK inhibitor), erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor), fulvestrant, and cisplatin are awaited.

In this study, shRNA knockdown of PIK3CA in three cell lines clearly demonstrated dependence on this p110 isoform. However, as many of the cell lines examined expressed PIK3CB, we cannot rule out that the effects of GDC-0941 on PIK3CB may have contributed to the observed effects of this inhibitor. As p110α-specific drugs e.g. NVP-BYL719 [55], are now in clinical trials, it will be important to assess the relative dependence of each isoform in UC, prior to consideration of potential clinical studies.

Levels of pAKT (Ser473) were decreased by GDC-0941 treatment, independent of whether a cell line was sensitive or resistant, as previously reported [26, 27, 56]. Resistant cell lines may not be dependent on AKT signaling or may have additional mechanisms to activate the PI3K pathway. Interestingly, RT4, the most resistant cell line in this study, had an undetectable basal level of AKT activation compared to the other cell lines studied. As this cell line has mutant TSC1, this implies that only the mTOR branch of the pathway is active in this case, as shown previously [20]. As many PIK3CA mutant cancers rely on effectors other than AKT, such as PDK1 and its substrate SGK3 [57], phospho-AKT may not be an ideal pharmacodynamic biomarker for relevant PI3K inhibition.

The effect of GDC-0941 in the majority of sensitive bladder cancer cells was via induction of both G1 cell cycle arrest and some apoptosis. Thus in some contexts, single agent GDC-0941 may exert cytotoxic and cytostatic effects in UC as seen in other tumor models [26, 27, 58]. Dual inhibition of mTOR and PI3K has been shown to be a promising approach in cell lines from other cancer types [29] and may be particularly efficacious in bladder where molecular lesions are found in multiple genes in the PI3K pathway, often concurrently [4].

Conclusions

Our observations indicate a good therapeutic window for PI3K inhibitors in some bladder cancers that harbor PI3K hotspot mutations, as well as those with co-existing NRAS mutations. The first in human phase I clinical study of GDC-0941 in patients with advanced solid tumors has recently been completed and showed promising results with minimal toxicities at doses sufficient to decrease PI3K pathway activation [30]. In UC, a disease for which targeted therapy is still in early stages, our data suggest that PI3K targeted therapy can benefit patients with PIK3CA mutations and that mutation can act as a biomarker for patient selection. Additional preclinical work is warranted to assess the impact of dual mTOR-PI3K and MEK-PI3K inhibition on a large panel of UC cell lines with a range of PI3K/AKT and MEK/ERK pathway genetic alterations to fully understand the context for optimal therapy of PI3K pathway-dependent bladder tumors. Currently, trials of GDC-0941 in combination with other agents suggested by preclinical studies, such as paclitaxel and inhibitors of MEK1 and EGFR [59–61], are in progress.

Abbreviations

KD, knockdown; NS, non-specific; PI, propidium iodide; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; TCC, transitional cell carcinoma; TERT-NHUC, telomerase-immortalized normal urothelial cells; UC, urothelial carcinoma.

References

  1. 1.

    Herr HW, Dotan Z, Donat SM, Bajorin DF. Defining optimal therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol. 2007;177(2):437–43.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Griffiths G, Hall R, Sylvester R, Raghavan D, Parmar MK. International phase III trial assessing neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of the BA06 30894 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(16):2171–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM, Speights VO, Vogelzang NJ, Trump DL, deVere White RW, Sarosdy MF, Wood Jr DP, Raghavan D, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(9):859–66.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Knowles MA, Hurst CD. Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(1):25–41.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature. 2014;507(7492):315–22.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rouanne M, Loriot Y, Lebret T, Soria JC. Novel therapeutic targets in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;98:106–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cantley LC. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. Science. 2002;296(5573):1655–57.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    López-Knowles E, Hernández S, Malats N, Kogevinas M, Lloreta J, Carrato A, Tardón A, Serra C, Real FX. PIK3CA mutations are an early genetic alteration associated with FGFR3 mutations in superficial papillary bladder tumors. Cancer Res. 2006;66(15):7401–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Platt FM, Hurst CD, Taylor CF, Gregory WM, Harnden P, Knowles MA. Spectrum of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway gene alterations in bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(19):6008–17.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Askham JM, Platt F, Chambers PA, Snowden H, Taylor CF, Knowles MA. AKT1 mutations in bladder cancer: identification of a novel oncogenic mutation that can co-operate with E17K. Oncogene. 2010;29(1):150–5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Aveyard JS, Skilleter A, Habuchi T, Knowles MA. Somatic mutation of PTEN in bladder carcinopma. Br J Cancer. 1999;80:904–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cairns P, Evron E, Okami K, Halachmi N, Esteller M, Herman JG, Bose S, Wang SI, Parsons R, Sidransky D. Point mutation and homozygous deletion of PTEN/MMAC1 in primary bladder cancers. Oncogene. 1998;16(24):3215–18.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ross RL, Burns JE, Taylor CF, Mellor P, Anderson DH, Knowles MA. Identification of mutations in distinct regions of p85 alpha in urothelial cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e84411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sjodahl G, Lauss M, Gudjonsson S, Liedberg F, Hallden C, Chebil G, Mansson W, Hoglund M, Lindgren D. A systematic study of gene mutations in urothelial carcinoma; inactivating mutations in TSC2 and PIK3R1. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18583.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Calderaro J, Rebouissou S, de Koning L, Masmoudi A, Herault A, Dubois T, Maille P, Soyeux P, Sibony M, de la Taille A, et al. PI3K/AKT pathway activation in bladder carcinogenesis. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(8):1776–84.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Iyer G, Hanrahan AJ, Milowsky MI, Al-Ahmadie H, Scott SN, Janakiraman M, Pirun M, Sander C, Socci ND, Ostrovnaya I, et al. Genome sequencing identifies a basis for everolimus sensitivity. Science. 2012;338(6104):221.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wagle N, Grabiner BC, Van Allen EM, Hodis E, Jacobus S, Supko JG, Stewart M, Choueiri TK, Gandhi L, Cleary JM, et al. Activating mTOR mutations in a patient with an extraordinary response on a phase I trial of everolimus and pazopanib. Cancer Discovery. 2014;4(5):546–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rodon J, Dienstmann R, Serra V, Tabernero J. Development of PI3K inhibitors: lessons learned from early clinical trials. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10(3):143–53.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Klempner SJ, Myers AP, Cantley LC. What a tangled web we weave: emerging resistance mechanisms to inhibition of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(12):1345–54.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sathe A, Guerth F, Cronauer MV, Heck MM, Thalgott M, Gschwend JE, Retz M, Nawroth R. Mutant PIK3CA controls DUSP1-dependent ERK 1/2 activity to confer response to AKT target therapy. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(11):2103–13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dickstein RJ, Nitti G, Dinney CP, Davies BR, Kamat AM, McConkey DJ. Autophagy limits the cytotoxic effects of the AKT inhibitor AZ7328 in human bladder cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2012;13(13):1325–38.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    The Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature. 2014;507:315–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wallin JJ, Guan J, Edgar KA, Zhou W, Francis R, Torres AC, Haverty PM, Eastham-Anderson J, Arena S, Bardelli A, et al. Active PI3K pathway causes an invasive phenotype which can be reversed or promoted by blocking the pathway at divergent nodes. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36402.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wallin JJ, Guan J, Prior WW, Edgar KA, Kassees R, Sampath D, Belvin M, Friedman LS. Nuclear phospho-Akt increase predicts synergy of PI3K inhibition and doxorubicin in breast and ovarian cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(48):48ra66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Spoerke JM, O’Brien C, Huw L, Koeppen H, Fridlyand J, Brachmann RK, Haverty PM, Pandita A, Mohan S, Sampath D, et al. Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase (PI3K) pathway alterations are associated with histologic subtypes and are predictive of sensitivity to PI3K inhibitors in lung cancer preclinical models. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(24):6771–83.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    O’Brien C, Wallin JJ, Sampath D, GuhaThakurta D, Savage H, Punnoose EA, Guan J, Berry L, Prior WW, Amler LC, et al. Predictive biomarkers of sensitivity to the phosphatidylinositol 3′ kinase inhibitor GDC-0941 in breast cancer preclinical models. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(14):3670–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Munugalavadla V, Mariathasan S, Slaga D, Du C, Berry L, Del Rosario G, Yan Y, Boe M, Sun L, Friedman LS, et al. The PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 combines with existing clinical regimens for superior activity in multiple myeloma. Oncogene. 2014;33:316–325.

  28. 28.

    Weigelt B, Warne PH, Downward J. PIK3CA mutation, but not PTEN loss of function, determines the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to mTOR inhibitory drugs. Oncogene. 2011;30(29):3222-33.

  29. 29.

    Wallin JJ, Edgar KA, Guan J, Berry M, Prior WW, Lee L, Lesnick JD, Lewis C, Nonomiya J, Pang J, et al. GDC-0980 is a novel class I PI3K/mTOR kinase inhibitor with robust activity in cancer models driven by the PI3K pathway. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011;10(12):2426–36.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sarker D, Ang JE, Baird R, Kristeleit R, Shah K, Moreno V, Clarke PA, Raynaud FI, Levy G, Ware JA, et al. First-in-human phase I study of pictilisib (GDC-0941), a potent pan-class I phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(1):77–86.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Weigelt B, Downward J. Genomic determinants of PI3K pathway inhibitor response in cancer. Front Oncol. 2012;2:109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ross RL, Askham JM, Knowles MA. PIK3CA mutation spectrum in urothelial carcinoma reflects cell context-dependent signaling and phenotypic outputs. Oncogene. 2013;32(6):768–76.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Williams RD. Human urologic cancer cell lines. Investig Urol. 1980;17:359–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tzeng CC, Liu HS, Li C, Jin YT, Chen RM, Yang WH, Lin JS. Characterization of two urothelium cancer cell lines derived from a blackfoot disease endemic area in Taiwan. Anticancer Res. 1996;16(4A):1797–804.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Elliot AY, Cleveland P, Cervenka J, Castro AE, Stein N, Hakala TR, Fraley EE. Characterization of a cell line from human transitional cell cancer of the urinary tract. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1974;53:1341–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chapman EJ, Hurst CD, Pitt E, Chambers P, Aveyard JS, Knowles MA. Expression of hTERT immortalises normal human urothelial cells without inactivation of the p16/Rb pathway. Oncogene. 2006;25(36):5037–45.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Tomlinson DC, Hurst CD, Knowles MA. Knockdown by shRNA identifies S249C mutant FGFR3 as a potential therapeutic target in bladder cancer. Oncogene. 2007;26(40):5889–99.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Matsukura S, Jones PA, Takai D. Establishment of conditional vectors for hairpin siRNA knockdowns. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(15):e77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Tomlinson D, Baldo O, Harnden P, Knowles M. FGFR3 protein expression and its relationship to mutation status and prognostic variables in bladder cancer. J Pathol. 2007;213(1):91–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lamont FR, Tomlinson DC, Cooper PA, Shnyder SD, Chester JD, Knowles MA. Small molecule FGF receptor inhibitors block FGFR-dependent urothelial carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(1):75–82.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Folkes AJ, Ahmadi K, Alderton WK, Alix S, Baker SJ, Box G, Chuckowree IS, Clarke PA, Depledge P, Eccles SA, et al. The identification of 2-(1H-indazol-4-yl)-6-(4-methanesulfonyl-piperazin-1-ylmethyl)-4-morpholin -4-yl-thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (GDC-0941) as a potent, selective, orally bioavailable inhibitor of class I PI3 kinase for the treatment of cancer. J Med Chem. 2008;51(18):5522–32.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hurst CD, Zuiverloon TC, Hafner C, Zwarthoff EC, Knowles MA. A SNaPshot assay for the rapid and simple detection of four common hotspot codon mutations in the PIK3CA gene. BMC Res Notes. 2009;2:66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Fogh J. Cultivation, characterization, and identification of human tumor cells with emphasis on kidney, testis, and bladder tumors. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1978;49:5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Munugalavadla V, Mariathasan S, Slaga D, Du C, Berry L, Del Rosario G, Yan Y, Boe M, Sun L, Friedman LS, et al. The PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 combines with existing clinical regimens for superior activity in multiple myeloma. Oncogene. 2014;33(3):316–25.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Huang WS, Wang TB, He Y, Chen YJ, Zhong SL, Tan M. Phosphoinositide-3-kinase, catalytic, alpha polypeptide RNA interference inhibits growth of colon cancer cell SW948. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(26):3458–64.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zhang X, Deng HX, Zhao X, Su D, Chen XC, Chen LJ, Wei YQ, Zhong Q, Li ZY, He X, et al. RNA interference-mediated silencing of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit attenuates growth of human ovarian cancer cells in vitroand in vivo. Oncology. 2009;77(1):22–32.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Zhou XK, Tang SS, Yi G, Hou M, Chen JH, Yang B, Liu JF, He ZM. RNAi knockdown of PIK3CA preferentially inhibits invasion of mutant PIK3CA cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(32):3700–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Gustin JP, Karakas B, Weiss MB, Abukhdeir AM, Lauring J, Garay JP, Cosgrove D, Tamaki A, Konishi H, Konishi Y, et al. Knockin of mutant PIK3CA activates multiple oncogenic pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(8):2835–40.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Isakoff SJ, Engelman JA, Irie HY, Luo J, Brachmann SM, Pearline RV, Cantley LC, Brugge JS. Breast cancer-associated PIK3CA mutations are oncogenic in mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65(23):10992–1000.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Pang H, Flinn R, Patsialou A, Wyckoff J, Roussos ET, Wu H, Pozzuto M, Goswami S, Condeelis JS, Bresnick AR, et al. Differential enhancement of breast cancer cell motility and metastasis by helical and kinase domain mutations of Class IA Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase. Cancer Res. 2009;23:8868–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Weigelt B, Warne PH, Lambros MB, Reis-Filho JS, Downward J. PI3K pathway dependencies in endometrioid endometrial cancer cell lines. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(13):3533–44.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Janku F, Wheler JJ, Westin SN, Moulder SL, Naing A, Tsimberidou AM, Fu S, Falchook GS, Hong DS, Garrido-Laguna I, et al. PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in patients with breast and gynecologic malignancies harboring PIK3CA mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(8):777–82.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Aksamitiene E, Kholodenko BN, Kolch W, Hoek JB, Kiyatkin A. PI3K/Akt-sensitive MEK-independent compensatory circuit of ERK activation in ER-positive PI3K-mutant T47D breast cancer cells. Cell Signal. 2010;22(9):1369–78.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Serra V, Scaltriti M, Prudkin L, Eichhorn PJ, Ibrahim YH, Chandarlapaty S, Markman B, Rodriguez O, Guzman M, Rodriguez S, et al. PI3K inhibition results in enhanced HER signaling and acquired ERK dependency in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. Oncogene. 2011;30(22):2547–57.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Fritsch C, Huang A, Chatenay-Rivauday C, Schnell C, Reddy A, Liu M, Kauffmann A, Guthy D, Erdmann D, De Pover A, et al. Characterization of the novel and specific PI3Kalpha inhibitor NVP-BYL719 and development of the patient stratification strategy for clinical trials. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(5):1117–29.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Covey TM, Vira MA, Westfall M, Gulrajani M, Cholankeril M, Okhunov Z, Levey HR, Marimpietri C, Hawtin R, Fields SZ, et al. Single cell network profiling assay in bladder cancer. Cytometry A. 2013;83(4):386–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Vasudevan KM, Barbie DA, Davies MA, Rabinovsky R, McNear CJ, Kim JJ, Hennessy BT, Tseng H, Pochanard P, Kim SY, et al. AKT-independent signaling downstream of oncogenic PIK3CA mutations in human cancer. Cancer Cell. 2009;16(1):21–32.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Wallin JJ, Guan J, Prior WW, Lee LB, Berry L, Belmont LD, Koeppen H, Belvin M, Friedman LS, Sampath D. GDC-0941, a novel class I selective PI3K inhibitor, enhances the efficacy of docetaxel in human breast cancer models by increasing cell death in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(14):3901–11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Hoeflich KP, O’Brien C, Boyd Z, Cavet G, Guerrero S, Jung K, Januario T, Savage H, Punnoose E, Truong T, et al. In vivo antitumor activity of MEK and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors in basal-like breast cancer models. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(14):4649–64.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Junttila TT, Akita RW, Parsons K, Fields C, Lewis Phillips GD, Friedman LS, Sampath D, Sliwkowski MX. Ligand-independent HER2/HER3/PI3K complex is disrupted by trastuzumab and is effectively inhibited by the PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941. Cancer Cell. 2009;15(5):429–40.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Yao E, Zhou W, Lee-Hoeflich ST, Truong T, Haverty PM, Eastham-Anderson J, Lewin-Koh N, Gunter B, Belvin M, Murray LJ, et al. Suppression of HER2/HER3-mediated growth of breast cancer cells with combinations of GDC-0941 PI3K inhibitor, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(12):4147–56.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Workman P, Aboagye EO, Balkwill F, Balmain A, Bruder G, Chaplin DJ, Double JA, Everitt J, Farningham DA, Glennie MJ, et al. Guidelines for the welfare and use of animals in cancer research. Br J Cancer. 2010;102(11):1555–77.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kilkenny C, Browne W, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG, Group NCRRGW. Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160(7):1577–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(6):e1000412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Patricia Cooper for setting up xenografts and Filomena Esteves for carrying out immunohistochemical staining of xenograft tissues.

Funding

This work was funded by a grant to the University of Leeds from the Medical Research Council and from Yorkshire Cancer Research (L362).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

Authors’ contributions

The study was conceived by MK and RR. Laboratory work was conducted by RR. HM and LK assisted with cell culture and GDC-0941 viability assays. Tumorigenicity assays were carried out by SS. CH analysed RNA expression data for PIK3CA, PIK3CB and PIK3CD in normal human urothelial cells. OA performed various statistical analyses of the data. The manuscript was written by RR and MK. All authors gave final approval of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

All experimental animal work was carried out under a Project Licence (PPL 40/3133) issued by the UK Home Office according to government legislation, following approval of the work by the local Animal Welfare Ethics Review Board at the University of Bradford. Animal suffering was minimised by adhering to the UK National Cancer Research Institute Guidelines for the Welfare of Animals [62], and considering the ARRIVE Guidelines [63, 64] when designing individual experiments.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Section of Experimental Oncology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James’s University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK

    R. L. Ross, H. R. McPherson, L. Kettlewell, C. D. Hurst, O. Alder & M. A. Knowles

  2. Institute of Cancer Therapeutics, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK

    S. D. Shnyder

Authors
  1. R. L. Ross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. R. McPherson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Kettlewell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. D. Shnyder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. D. Hurst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. O. Alder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. A. Knowles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Knowles.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

PI3K pathway alterations in the panel of bladder cancer cell lines used in GDC-0941 viability assay. (DOCX 130 kb)

Additional file 2:

The relationship between knockdown of PIK3CA and characteristics in UC cell lines. (DOCX 72 kb)

Additional file 3:

Ki67 immunohistochemistry analysis of tumors generated from PIK3CA KD and controls (non-specific KD) xenografts. (TIF 4887 kb)

Additional file 4:

Expression of PIK3CA, PIK3CB and PIK3CD in bladder cancer cell lines measured by microarray. (TIF 370 kb)

Additional file 5:

The effect of GDC-0941 on viability of bladder cancer and TERT-NHUC cell lines. (TIF 701 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ross, R.L., McPherson, H.R., Kettlewell, L. et al. PIK3CA dependence and sensitivity to therapeutic targeting in urothelial carcinoma. BMC Cancer 16, 553 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2570-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • PIK3CA
  • PI3K signaling
  • Bladder cancer
  • Urothelium

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us