Open Peer Review Reports for: Utilizing native fluorescence imaging, modeling and simulation to examine pharmacokinetics and therapeutic regimen of a novel anticancer prodrug
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2015 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 8 Dec 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sankarprasad Bhuniya |
| 5 Jan 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Markos Leggas |
| 11 Mar 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Jing-Hung Wang |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 11 Mar 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 15 Mar 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sankarprasad Bhuniya |
| 22 Apr 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Jing-Hung Wang |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 22 Apr 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 2 Jun 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Jing-Hung Wang |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 2 Jun 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Jun 2016 | Editorially accepted | |
| 25 Jul 2016 | Article published | 10.1186/s12885-016-2508-6 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
