Skip to main content

Table 3 Patient subgroups that are more of less likely to receive targeted therapy while fulfilling SUTENT trial eligibility criteria

From: Variation in use of targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results from a Dutch population-based registry

 

2008–2010 Cohort: mRCC at the initial diagnosis

2011–2013 Cohort: mRCC

Intermediate prognosis (n = 142)

Poor prognosis (n = 99)

Favourable/intermediate prognosis (n = 70)

Poor prognosis (n = 39)

 

No targeted therapy (n = 40)

Sunitinib (n = 102)

No targeted therapy (n = 29)

Sunitinib (n = 70)

No targeted therapy n = 25

Sunitinib n = 45

No targeted therapy n = 13

Sunitinib n = 26

Sex – n (%)

 Female

NS

NS

NS

NS

2 (8 %)

15 (33 %)

NS

NS

 Male

NS

NS

NS

NS

23 (92 %)

30 (67 %)

NS

NS

Median age – yr (range)

  

71 (43–84)

62 (23–89)

71 (44–79)

61 (39–79)

72 (57–82)

63 (42–79)

Site of metastasis – n (%)

 one

25 (62 %)

38 (37 %)

15 (53 %)

20 (29 %)

NS

NS

NS

NS

 more than one

15 (38 %)

64 (63 %)

14 (47 %)

50 (71 %)

NS

NS

NS

NS

Neutrophil count – n (%)

        

 normal

27 (68 %)

87 (85 %)

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

 > ULN

13 (33 %)

15 (15 %)

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Comorbidities

 Zero or one

NS

NS

15 (52 %)

52 (74 %)

NS

NS

NS

NS

 More than one

NS

NS

14 (48 %)

18 (26 %)

NS

NS

NS

NS

  1. NOTE: This table shows patient subgroups that are more or less likely to receive targeted therapy (i.e. first-line sunitinib) among patients fulfilling SUTENT trial eligibility criteria (according to the multi-level mixed-effects models). The multi-level models initially included all patient and disease characteristics as mentioned in Table 1 (besides hospital of diagnosis). Not significant (NS) means that this variable was not significantly associated to prescription of sunitinib at α = 0.10 in a particular risk group/cohort
  2. Abbreviations: NS not significant