Skip to main content

Table 3 Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening using a single cohort

From: Economic evaluation of the breast cancer screening programme in the Basque Country: retrospective cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis

Ā 

0Ā % discounta

3Ā % discounta

Ā 

Mean

95Ā % CI

Mean

95Ā % CI

Screened population

Total costs (Million Euros)

213.0

204.7

221.3

161.9

155.9

167.8

ā€ƒScreening mammography costs

12.5

12.458

12.5

12.5

12.5

12.5

ā€ƒScreening diagnosis workup

2.9

2.7

3.1

2.9

2.8

3.1

ā€ƒClinical cancers diagnosis workup

3.0

2.9

3.2

2.2

2.1

2.3

ā€ƒTreatment costs

194.5

186.3

202.8

144.2

138.3

150.1

QALYs

1,231,858

1,228,748

1,234,968

997,681

995,195

1,000,168

Non-screened population

Total costs (Million Euros)

206.7

197.4

216.0

153.2

146.5

160.0

ā€ƒScreening mammography costs

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

ā€ƒScreening diagnosis workup

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

ā€ƒClinical cancers diagnosis workup

3.9

3.7

4.1

3.1

2.9

3.2

ā€ƒTreatment costs

202.8

193.6

212.1

150.2

143.5

156.9

QALYs

1,229,578

1,226,441

1,232,715

995,803

993,304

998,301

Difference (Screened - Unscreened)

Total costs (Million Euros)

6.3

2.5

10.1

8.6

5.7

202.8

ā€ƒScreening mammography costs

12.5

12.5

12.5

12.5

12.5

12.5

ā€ƒScreening diagnosis workup

2.9

2.7

3.1

2.9

2.8

3.1

ā€ƒClinical cancers diagnosis workup

āˆ’0.9

āˆ’1.1

āˆ’0.7

āˆ’0.9

āˆ’1.0

āˆ’0.7

ā€ƒTreatment costs

āˆ’8.3

āˆ’12.1

āˆ’4.5

āˆ’6.0

āˆ’8.9

āˆ’3.0

QALYs

2,280

1,986

2,575

1,879

1,650

2,108

ICER

2,778

974

4,582

4,623

2,830

6,416

  1. CI confidence interval, QALY quality-adjusted life years, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
  2. aDiscount applied beginning from the end of the evaluated period until death