Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes to axitinib

From: Response to post-axitinib treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Characteristic

N (%)

Gender

 

 Male

18 (72 %)

 Female

7 (28 %)

Age at Start of Axitinib (years)a

 

 Median (range)

59 (44-78)

Histology

 

 Clear cell

24 (96 %)

 Unclassified

1 (4 %)

Prior Nephrectomy

 

 No

2 (8 %)

 Yes

23 (92 %)

Prior Systemic Treatment

 

 No

7 (28 %)

 Yes

18 (72 %)

 IFN and/or IL-2

11 (44 %)

 Sorafenib

9 (36 %)

 Sunitinib

6 (24 %)

 Temsirolimus

1 (4 %)

 Bevacizumab

1 (3 %)

 Otherb

4 (16 %)

Interval from Dx of Mets to Axitiniba

 

 Median in months (range)

20.1 (0.2–49.9)

ECOG PS

 

 0

7 (28 %)

 1

18 (72 %)

Heng Risk Groupc

 

 Favorable

7 (30 %)

 Intermediate

15 (65 %)

 Unfavorable

1 (4 %)

Sites of Metastatic Disease

 

 Lung

20 (80 %)

 Lymph nodes

13 (52 %)

 Bone

6 (24 %)

 Liver

5 (20 %)

 Adrenal

5 (20 %)

 Pancreas

4 (16 %)

 Brain

2 (8 %)

 Otherd

12 (48 %)

Best Response to axitinib

 

 CR

1 (4 %)

 PR

13 (52 %)

 SD

10 (40 %)

 PD

1 (4 %)

Reason Axitinib Stopped

 

 PD

21 (84 %)

 Toxicity

4 (16 %)

Duration of Treatment

 

 Median in months (range)

11.2 (1.1–90.0)

  1. amissing for one patient
  2. balone or in combination: thalidomide (n = 3); gemcitabine,5-FU, ABX-EGF, capecitabine, lenalidomide, suramin, vinblastine (n = 1 each)
  3. cmissing for two patients
  4. dkidney/renal bed (n = 5); pleura (n = 4); abdominal wall, muscle, omentum, pelvic mass, retroperitoneum, soft tissue (n = 1 each)