Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Differences in predictions of ODE models of tumor growth: a cautionary example

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Aug 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Aug 2015 Author responded Author comments - Hope Murphy
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Aug 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrea Sottoriva
21 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jiejie Xu
28 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luis Mariano Esteban
29 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - JS Michaelson
28 Nov 2015 Author responded Author comments - Hope Murphy
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Nov 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Hope Murphy
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 Feb 2016 Editorially accepted
26 Feb 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12885-016-2164-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement