Site disparities in apoptotic variants as predictors of risk for second primary malignancy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Aug 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - George Koutsodontis|
|18 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Margaritis Avgeris|
|24 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Theodoros Rampias|
|5 Nov 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Guojun Li|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Nov 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - George Koutsodontis|
|1 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Margaritis Avgeris|
|5 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Theodoros Rampias|
|11 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Guojun Li|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Feb 2016||Editorially accepted|
|8 Feb 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12885-016-2110-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.