Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Site disparities in apoptotic variants as predictors of risk for second primary malignancy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Aug 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George Koutsodontis
18 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margaritis Avgeris
24 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Theodoros Rampias
5 Nov 2015 Author responded Author comments - Guojun Li
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Nov 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George Koutsodontis
1 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margaritis Avgeris
5 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Theodoros Rampias
11 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Guojun Li
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
3 Feb 2016 Editorially accepted
8 Feb 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12885-016-2110-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement