Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Prognostic value of high FoxC2 expression in resectable non-small cell lung cancer, alone or in combination with E-cadherin expression

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Aug 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
17 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Haresh Mani
25 Oct 2015 Author responded Author comments - Wei Jiang
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Oct 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
23 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Haresh Mani
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Dec 2015 Author responded Author comments - Wei Jiang
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Dec 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
6 Jan 2016 Editorially accepted
13 Jan 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12885-016-2056-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement