Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma

From: Prognostic significance of macrophage invasion in hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Variable

Category

Odds ratio

p

Confidence interval

Univariate analysis

Age

≤60/>60

1.588

0.239

0.735–3.430

Gender

male/female

1.287

0.517

0.600–2.761

perivascular lymphangiosis

negative/positive

0.734

0.430

0.340–1.583

R-Classification

negative/positive

2.325

0.039

1.042–5.189

Histologic differentiation

well or moderate/poor

2.141

0.103

0.857–5.344

Vascular invasion

negative/positive

1.285

0.569

0.542–3.045

pT

pT2/pT3

1.242

0.597

0.557–2.768

pN

negative/positive

0.535

0.124

0.242–1.186

Perineural sheet infiltration

negative/positive

0.289

0.224

0.039–2.137

Lymphangiosis carcinomatosa

negative/positive

0.835

0.651

0.381–1.827

CD68 + TAMs

high/low

0.977

0.951

0.457–2.088

CD68 + TAMs in TIF

high/low

0.322

0.013

0.132–0.784

Overall Tumor Recurrence

negative/positive

0.112

0.001

0.033–0.37

Distant Metastasis

negative/positive

0.528

0.111

0.240–1.159

Local Tumor Recurrence

negative/positive

0.183

0.001

0.076–0.441

Multivariate analysis

R Classification

negative/positive

0.830

0.710

0.312–2.212

Overall Tumor Recurrence

negative/positive

0.172

0.024

0.037–0.794

Local Tumor Recurrence

negative/positive

0.544

0.432

0.119–2.486

CD68-positive TAMs in TIF

high/low

0.856

0.780

0.287–2.553

Multivariate analysis (Recurrence free survival)

R0 & R1/2 surgery/n = 47

R Classification

negative/positive

1.935

0.149

0.789–4.743

CD68-positive TAMs in TIF

high/low

0.324

0.014

0.132–0.796

R0 & R1/2 surgery/n = 47

only R0 surgery/n = 37

Histologic Differentiation

well or moderate/poor

2.549

0.109

0.811–8.012

CD68-positive TAMs in TIF

high/low

0.286

0.024

0.097–0.846

only R0 surgery/n = 37