Skip to main content

Table 5 Cost differences between chemotherapy-based and hormone therapy-based therapy options based on hormone therapy sensitivitya

From: Patterns of resource utilization and cost for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2–negative advanced breast cancer in Europe

  

Total Cohort Analysis

Subgroup analysis

Patient group description

All patients (n = 355)

HT-refractoryb in 1st line (n = 107)

HT-eligiblec in 2nd line (n = 248)

Total cost difference (over 3 lines of therapy)d

HT instead of CTx in 1st line

€14 362

€7300

NA

HT instead of CTx in 2nd line

€10 368

NA

€10 300

Cost difference (for 1 line of therapy)d

1st line HT vs 2nd line CTx

€9879 (~€1900/mo)

€7550 (~€1650/mo)

NA

1st line HT vs 1st line CTx

€15 167 (~€2500/mo)

€13 850 (~€2350/mo)

NA

2nd line HT vs 2nd line CTx

€8201 (~€1700/mo)

NA

€8550 (~€1700/mo)

  1. Abbreviations: ABC advanced breast cancer, CTx chemotherapy, HT hormone therapy, mo month, NA not applicable
  2. aNumbers in the table reflect cost savings with HT versus CTx
  3. bHormone refractory indicated recurrence within 1 year of adjuvant HT
  4. cHormone eligible indicates de novo (no adjuvant therapy) or recurrent disease ≥1 year following adjuvant HT
  5. dCosts analysis was based on unit cost assumptions for each country, which were then averaged