Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparative evaluation between the EMBRACE and the ERIBEX studies

From: Tumour biology, metastatic sites and taxanes sensitivity as determinants of eribulin mesylate efficacy in breast cancer: results from the ERIBEX retrospective, international, multicenter study

 

EMBRACE

ERIBEX

Population

 Patients (n)

503 (EM)

258

 Age (years)

55

59

 Triple-negative tumour (%)

18

22.5

 HER2+ tumour (%)

16

10.2

 Prior hormonal therapy (%)

85

76.7

 Prior anthracycline or taxane treatment (%)

99

100

 Prior capecitabine treatment (%)

73

90.7

 Median prior metastatic chemotherapies; n (range)

4 (1–7)

4 (1–9)

Metastatic sites

 Bone (%)

61

68.2

 Liver (%)

60

67.4

 Node (%)

44

45.7

 Lung (%)

38

38

Chemotherapy

 Median number of EM cycles (range)

5 (1–23)

5 (1–19)

Efficacy

 Median overall survival (month, 95 %CI)

13.1

11.2 (9.3–12.12

 Median progression-free survival (month, 95 %CI)

3.7

3.8 (3.2–4.2)

 Overall response rate (%)

12

26

 Clinical benefit rate

23

36

Safety

 Side effects (grade 1–4, %)

99

94.2

Side effects most commonly encountered

 Asthenia (%)

54

60.9

 Neutropenia (%)

52

38.4

 Peripheral Neuropathies (%)

35

43

 Nausea (%)

35

10.5

 Alopecia (%)

45

19.4

Grade 3 toxicity (%)

36.2

39.5

Grade 4 toxicity (%)

27.2

17

 Grade 3–4 neutropenia

21 %/24 %

20.9 % grade 3–4

 Grade 3-/4 peripheral neuropathy

8 %/<1 %

3.9 % grade 3–4

Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity (%)

13

13.1