Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of cohort, tumour, treatment and reference standard characteristics of studies included in the individual patient data analysis

From: Agreement between MRI and pathologic breast tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and comparison with alternative tests: individual patient data meta-analysis

  

Study level estimates

Variable

Patients (%)

Median

IQR

Range

Cohort characteristics

    

N patients with MRI (8 studies)

300 (NA)

36

28 – 50

13 – 59

Recruitment mid-point (year) (4 studies)

144 (NA)

2003

2001 – 2005

2001 – 2006

Age, mean or median (years) (8 studies)

300 (NA)

47

46 – 48

43 – 49

Menopausal status (%)a (2 studies)

  Pre

51 (72.9)

64.6

60.4 – 68.8

60.4 – 68.8

  Peri/post

19 (27.1)

25.0

18.8 – 31.2

18.8 – 31.2

Tumour characteristics

    

Clinical size, mean or median (cm)a (4 studies)

136 (NA)

4.6

4.2 – 6.6

4.0 – 8.2

T stage (%)a (4 studies)

  T1

5 (2.9)

2.9

1.0 – 5.0

0.0 – 6.2

  T2

62 (35.8)

43.0

23.9 – 50.3

6.2 – 56.2

  T3

78 (45.1)

43.6

38.3 – 49.1

37.5 – 50.0

  T4

28 (16.2)

9.8

0.0 – 30.6

0.0 – 41.7

Stage (%)a (6 studies)

  I

1 (0.5)

0.0

0.0 – 0.0

0.0 – 3.1

  II

131 (59.0)

66.1

45.0 – 78.0

27.1 – 86.7

  III

83 (37.4)

32.3

22.0 – 37.5

0.0 – 72.9

  IV

7 (3.2)

0.0

0.0 – 0.0

0.0 – 17.5

Histology (%)a (6 studies)

  IDC

191 (84.1)

86.2

74.2 – 87.8

68.8 – 90.0

  ILC or IDC/ILC

19 (8.4)

9.8

5.1 – 10.0

4.9 – 18.8

  Other

17 (7.5)

7.9

4.0 – 12.5

0.0 – 16.1

Nodal status (%)a (4 studies)

  Positive

109 (72.2)

71.0

62.5 – 80.6

56.2 – 87.8

  Negative

42 (27.8)

29.0

19.4 – 37.5

12.2 – 43.8

ER (%)a (5 studies)

  Positive

113 (60.1)

62.5

60.0 – 64.4

45.0 – 69.2

  Negative

73 (38.8)

37.5

32.2 – 40.0

15.4 – 55.0

  Unknown or NR

2 (1.1)

0.0

0.0 – 0.0

0.0 – 3.4

PR (%)a (4 studies)

  Positive

71 (44.9)

41.2

32.9 – 49.8

30.8 – 52.1

  Negative

84 (53.2)

51.5

47.5 – 59.4

48.5 – 65.0

  Unknown or NR

3 (1.9)

1.0

0.0 – 2.7

0.0 – 3.4

HER2 (%) (3 studies)

  Positive

42 (28.8)

29.2

22.5 – 33.9

22.5 – 33.9

  Negative

97 (66.4)

62.5

61.0 – 77.5

61.0 – 77.5

  Unknown or NR

7 (4.8)

5.1

0.0 – 8.3

0.0 – 8.3

Treatment

    

NAC regimen (%)a (8 studies)

  Anthracycline-based

115 (38.1)

9.3

0.0 – 77.6

0.0 – 100.0

  Antracycline-taxane-based

181 (59.9)

88.1

17.4 – 100.0

0.0 – 100.0

  Other

6 (2.0)

0.0

0.0 – 2.5

0.0 – 100.0

Trastuzumab (%)a (3 studies)

  Trastuzumab used

29 (19.6)

7.3

2.1 – 42.4

2.1 – 42.4

  Trastuzumab not used

119 (80.4)

92.7

57.6 – 97.9

57.6 – 97.9

Type of surgery (%)a (8 studies)

  BCS

132 (43.1)

50.3

37.6 – 55.9

6.2 – 59.4

  Mastectomy

172 (56.2)

57.2

44.1 – 63.8

34.4 – 93.8

  No surgery

2b (0.7)

0.0

0.0 – 0.0

0.0 – 6.2

Reference standard

    

Type of reference standard (%) (8 studies)

  Pathology

298 (99.3)

100.0

100.0 – 100.0

93.8 – 100.0

  Other

2b (0.7)

0.0

0.0 – 0.0

0.0 – 6.2

Time from MRI to surgery, mean or median/estimate (days) (6 studies)

228 (NA)

16

12 – 25

7 - 28

Prevalence of pCR (%) (8 studies)

300 (NA)

19.0

15.5 – 23.4

7.1 – 27.5

  1. BCS breast conserving surgery, DCIS ductal carcinoma in situ, ER estrogen receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, IDC invasive ductal carcinoma, ILC invasive lobular carcinoma, IQR inter-quartile range, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, NA not applicable, NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, NR not reported, pCR pathologic complete response, PR progesterone receptor
  2. aCalculation of values based on total number of patients enrolled, a minority of whom may not have contributed data to this analysis
  3. bLocalisation biopsy showed the absence of residual tumour (i.e. pathologic measurement of 0.0 cm)