Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of the prognosis and recurrence of apparent early-stage ovarian tumors treated with laparoscopy and laparotomy: a meta-analysis of clinical studies

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Dec 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
14 Aug 2015 Editorially accepted
26 Aug 2015 Article published 10.1186/s12885-015-1604-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement