Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of experts

From: Framing overdiagnosis in breast screening: a qualitative study with Australian experts

Participants 33 (Brackets contain number of experts who were invited but did not-participate; 13)

Professional role*

Clinicians^ 15 (3)

 

• Oncologists 3 (1)

 

• Surgeons 4 (0)

 

• Breast physicians 1 (2)

 

• Radiologists 2 (0)

 

• Radiation oncologists 2 (0)

 

• Pathologists 3 (0)

 

• Others [not otherwise specified; NOS)] 0 (1)

 

Non-clinical researchers 14 (3)

 

• Epidemiologists/biostatisticians 9 (1)

 

• Others [NOS] 5 (1)

 

Administrators/managers 6 (2)

 

Advocacy leaders 6 (7)

 

• Consumers working in advocacy 3 (6)

• Clinicians/researchers working in advocacy 3 (1)

Public stance on breast screening+

Supportive 16 (9)

Mostly supportive# 3 (1)

Critical 6 (0)

Unknown to researchers 8 (3)

  1. *note that some experts held more than one professional role
  2. ^Most clinicians engaged in research to a greater or lesser extent
  3. +We loosely categorised potential interviewees as being “supportive”, “mostly supportive” or “critical” about breast screening based on publicly available commentary
  4. #Broadly supportive of breast screening but with selected concerns about one or more elements of the program