Author name and pub date | Intervention adherence | Adherence to the behavioural goals of the intervention | Follow-up rate | Reasons for withdraw from the intervention | Method and frequency of assessment of adherence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Smith Warner 2000 31 | Based upon clinic attendance, Attendance averaged 93Â % of all clinic visits | a 86Â % met or exceeded the fruit and vegetables goals of the intervention | 88Â % | 2Â % (2/100) inappropriately randomised, 10Â % (10/100) reason not reported | Baseline and at 3, 6, 9 and 12Â months. |
Objective and subjective; diet records and measurement of biological markers (concentrations of carotenoids, lipids, sodium and potassium). | |||||
Attendance monitored by intervention provider | |||||
Lanza 2001 32 | Not specified and inadequate data reported | Dietary goals met; | 89Â % | 4Â % (43/1037) died, | Baseline and end of each year plus unannounced 24Â h dietary recall in 10Â % of participants each year. |
Supplementary adherence data was extracted from Sansbury 2009 36 | 25.6 % (210/821) met 9–12 goals | 7 % (71/1037) withdrew due to illness, moved clinical centre, did not wish to continue | Subjective and objective, food frequency questionnaire, 4 day food records and 24 h dietary recalls and measurement of biological markers (concentrations of carotenoids and lipids) | ||
45 % (366/821) met 4–8 goals | |||||
29.8 % (245/821) met 0–3 goals. | |||||
Data reported did not allow distinction between the 3 dietary goals being evaluated | |||||
Emmons 2005 33 | 60 % received 4 to 5 intervention telephone calls conducted by health educators | Physical activity goals met by 13 % (76/591) | 83 % | No dropout reported | Baseline and end of 8 month study period. Subjective only–22 item food frequency and 24 item (CHAMPS) activity questionnaire. |
Dietary targets met; | Receipt of telephone calls monitored by intervention provider | ||||
20Â % (118/591) met fruit and vegetable goals | |||||
18Â % (104/591) met red meat goals | |||||
Caswell 2009 34 | Insufficient data reported to enable calculation | Physical activity goals met by 47 % (15/32) | 78 % | Dropout calculated as 22 % (9/41) | Baseline and end of 12 week study period. Subjective only–24 h recall of fruit and vegetables and food frequency questionnaire to provide fibre consumption score (recorded mid week) and 7 day physical activity recall questionnaire. |
Dietary targets; | |||||
a Fruit and vegetable goals met by 84Â % (27/32) | |||||
a Fibre goals met by 53Â % (17/32) | |||||
Anderson 2014 35 | 97Â % attended all face to face sessions (3 sessions) | Data reported do not allow calculation of the % achieving 150Â min per week, moderate intensity physical activity | 91Â % | 15 participants withdrew, 7 gave no reason, | Baseline, 3 and 12Â months. |
59Â % completed all of the 9 planned telephone calls | Dietary targets; | Â | 3 withdrew due to health concerns, 1 moved, 2 reported personal reasons and 2 were unable to commit. | Subjective and objective, self reported daily diary and food frequency questionnaire measurement body weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, and of biological markers (e.g., total, low and high density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, glycated haemoglobin and insulin) | |
95Â % completed 5 of 9 telephone calls | a Fruit and vegetable goals met by 73Â % met. | Â | Â | SenseWear armband worn for 7Â days to measure daily expenditure and minutes of moderate intensity exercise. | |
Trained lifestyle counsellor recorded attendance |