Skip to main content

Table 7 Subgroup analysis for disease-specific survival

From: Lymph node density as a prognostic variable in node-positive bladder cancer: a meta-analysis

 

No. of included articles

No. of cases

Pooled HR (95 % CI)

Chi2 (p value)

I2

Ph*

Publication year

     

0.0517

2003–2010

4

375

1.61 (1.09–2.38)

7.42 (0.06)

60 %

 

2011–2014

6

2591

1.51 (1.16–1.97)

12.22 (0.03)

59 %

 

Region

     

0.3206

USA

3

1979

1.57 (1.10–2.22)

11.45 (0.003)

83 %

 

Europe

5

1679

1.54 (1.02–2.31)

14.19 (0.007)

72 %

 

Asia

2

261

1.61 (1.08–2.39)

0.46 (0.5)

0 %

 

No. of patients

     

0.0015

<100

5

331

1.40 (0.82–2.40)

12.35 (0.01)

68 %

 

≥100

5

2635

1.55 (1.23–1.95)

14.06 (0.007)

72 %

 

Median follow-up*

     

0.0017

<36 months

4

1643

1.85 (1.53–2.24)

2.58 (0.46)

0 %

 

≥36 months

5

544

1.20 (0.91–1.59)

7.43 (0.11)

46 %

 

Analysis results

     

0.1626

Not significant

4

382

1.14 (0.69–1.87)

7.37 (0.06)

59 %

 

Significant

6

2584

1.69 (1.31–2.17)

18.98 (0.002)

74 %

 

Quality scale

     

0.0233

≤4

7

2361

1.60 (1.26–2.03)

16.99 (0.009)

65 %

 

>4

3

605

1.08 (0.51–2.30)

8.91 (0.01)

78 %

 
  1. HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidence interval
  2. Ph* for heterogeneity between subgroups with meta-regression analysis
  3. *One study was excluded because the duration of follow-up was not available (Morgan [26])