Skip to main content

Table 2 Patient characteristics from the eligible studies

From: Lymph node density as a prognostic variable in node-positive bladder cancer: a meta-analysis

Study

No. of patients

Median age, range (years)

Gender (male/female)

Upper limit of PLND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Adjuvant chemotherapy

Median Follow-up, range (months)

Herr [5]

162

67 (36–87)

NA

Distal common iliac artery

0

NA

90 (24–180)

Fleischmann [18]

101

67 (35–89)

87/14

Crossing of the ureter with common iliac artery

0

41

21 (1–191)

Osawa [19]

60

68 (34–84)

48/12

Below the bifurcation of common iliac artery (almost) Above iliac bifurcation (a few)

0

25

41 (4–138)

Wiesner [20]

46

NA

NA

Inferior mesenteric artery

0

27

22 (1–76)

Furukawa [21]

82

70.3 (42–86)

62/20

Distal common iliac artery

0

17

33.6 (mean) (2–142)

Guzzo [22]

85

NA

67/18

Bifurcation of common iliac artery

0

55

46 (3–223)

Stephenson [23]

134

68 (IQR: 59–75)

NA

Distal common iliac artery

0

90

23 (IQR: 10–36)

May [24]

477

66.3 (33–86)

376/101

NA

0

159

16

Jensen [25]

43

NA

NA

Inferior mesenteric artery

0

0

53 (24–83)

Morgan [26]

779

NA

530/249

NA

28

296

NA

Kassouf [27]

1,038

67 (IQR: 60–73)

821/217

Not standardized

0

NA

33 (IQR: 14–69)

Masson-Lecomte [28]

75

65 (31–85)

64/11

Common iliac bifurcation

NA

46

40.6 (3–127)

Mmeje [29]

50

69 (mean) (50–83)

38/12

Aortic bifurcation

29

19

39.6 (16–75)

Kwon [30]

179

NA

NA

Not standardized

0

NA

64.3 (1–231.4)

  1. PLND: pelvic lymph node dissection, NA: not available, IQR: interquartile range