Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of continuous features for training (U.S.), first validation (Scandinavian) and second validation (Italian) datasets

From: How do we estimate survival? External validation of a tool for survival estimation in patients with metastatic bone disease—decision analysis and comparison of three international patient populations

  

Training set n = 189

Scandinavian set n = 815

Italian set n = 287

Feature

   

% missing

 

% missing

vs. Training set p

vs. Scandinavian set p

Age at surgery (years)b

Mean

62.4

66.3

0

63.1

0

0.54

<0.005*

SD

13.7

12.8

 

11.7

   

Median

62.7

67

 

64

   

IQR

54.4, 72.2

58, 76

 

56, 72

   

Hemoglobin concentration (mg/dL) a,b

Mean

11.5

11.5

0.6

11.5

10

0.83

0.90

SD

1.9

3.5

 

1.4

   

Median

11.4

11.3

 

12

   

IQR

10.1, 12.9

10.3, 12.6

 

11,13

   

Absolute lymphocyte count (K/μL)a,b

Mean

1.2

1.2

83.8

1.3

23

0.59

0.40

SD

1.3

0.74

 

0.50

   

Median

1.0

1.2

 

1.5

   

IQR

0.6, 1.5

0.8, 1.6

 

1.0, 2.0

   

Senior surgeon’s estimate of survival (months)a,b

Mean

10.3

N/A

100

11.2

87

0.56

N/A

SD

8.6

  

7.0

   

Median

6.0

  

10

   

IQR

4.0, 12.0

  

5, 20

   
  1. SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range, N/A not applicable
  2. *Distributions are significantly different between training and validation sets by two-tailed Student’s t-test
  3. aDenotes feature of 3-month model
  4. bDenotes feature of 12-month model