Skip to main content

Table 5 Description of clusters in terms of physicians’ characteristics – InCRisC (N=2094)

From: General Practitioners and Breast Surgeons in France, Germany, Netherlands and the UK show variable breast cancer risk communication profiles

 

Cluster 1, n=368 (17.6%)

Cluster 2, n=717 (34.2%)

Cluster 3, n=267 (12.7%)

Cluster 4, n=376 (18.0%)

Cluster 5, n=366 (17.5%)

 

Mean (SD)

AOR [CI 95%]

p

Mean (SD)

AOR [CI 95%]

p

Mean (SD)

AOR [CI 95%]

p

Mean (SD)

AOR

Mean (SD)

AOR [CI 95%]

p

Age

48.9 (9.1)

0.97 [0.96;0.99]

0.006

50.3 (8.9)

0.99 [0.98;1.01]

0.377

48.9 (8.4)

0.97 [0.96;0.99]

0.011

50.9 (8.7)

1

51.2 (8.5)

0.99 [0.98;1.01]

0.585

 

n (%)

  

n (%)

  

n (%)

  

n (%)

 

n (%)

  

Gender

              

  Female

156 (19.9)

1

 

258 (33.0)

1

 

88 (11.3)

1

 

133 (17.0)

1

147 (18.8)

1

 

  Male

212 (16.2)

0.91 [0.66;1.25]

0.564

459 (35.0)

0.98 [0.74;1.30]

0.886

179 (13.6)

1.18 [0.82;1.69]

0.374

243 (18.5)

1

219 (16.7)

0.81 [0.59;1.12]

0.207

Country

              

  France

62 (14.2)

1

 

186 (42.6)

1

 

71 (16.2)

1

 

55 (12.6)

1

63 (14.4)

1

 

  Germany

165 (18.2)

0.95 [0.62;1.46]

0.817

266 (29.3)

0.49 [0.34;0.70]

<.001

81 (8.9)

0.38 [0.24;0.59]

<.001

174 (19.2)

1

221 (23.4)

1.14 [0.75;1.73]

0.551

  NL

48 (12.4)

0.53 [0.31;0.89]

0.016

144 (37.3)

0.54 [0.35;0.81]

0.003

63 (16.3)

0.65 [0.40;1.05]

0.081

74 (19.2)

1

57 (14.8)

0.63 [0.38;1.05]

0.076

  UK

93 (25.5)

1.04 [0.64;1.70]

0.859

121 (33.2)

0.49 [0.32;0.75]

0.001

52 (14.3)

0.52 [0.31;0.86]

0.011

73 (20.1)

1

25 (6.9)

0.29 [0.16;0.51]

<.001

Speciality

              

  BS

144 (15.9)

1

 

258 (28.5)

1

 

147 (16.2)

1

 

195 (21.5)

1

161 (17.8)

1

 

  GPs

224 (18.8)

1.76 [1.31;2.38]

<.001

459 (38.6)

1.86 [1.44;2.41]

<.001

120 (10.1)

0.82 [0.59;1.13]

0.225

181 (15.2)

1

205 (17.2)

1.47 [1.09;1.98]

0.011

  1. Cluster 1: “No Verbal formulation & no Relative Risk mentioned” (n=368).
  2. Cluster 2: “No negative framing” (n=717).
  3. Cluster 3: “No Verbal Formulation” (n=267).
  4. Cluster 4: “Risks presented in all 4 ways” (n=376).
  5. Cluster 5: “Absolute numerical risks not presented” (n=366).