Skip to main content

Table 1 Cox proportional hazards analyses of the association between PFS and OS and the classification of the clinical cohorts for doxorubcin REGS developed using HBCCL or CGP cell line panels

From: Predicting response to multidrug regimens in cancer patients using cell line experiments and regularised regression models

 

HBCCL

CGP

 

N

HR (95% CI)

P-value

N

HR (95% CI)

P-value

REGS classifier (univariate)

IDRC (PFS)

470

2.58 (1.72,3.86)

4.37E-06

470

1.54 (1.07,2.22)

0.0211

LLMPP (PFS)

220

2.28 (1.10,4.73)

0.0269

220

1.70 (0.89,3.22)

0.105

MDFCI (OS)

67

4.56 (1.29,16.19)

0.0188

67

0.93 (0.28,3.04)

0.899

REGS classifier (adjusted for IPI)

IDRC (PFS)

424

2.52 (1.64,3.87)

2.65E-05

424

1.46 (0.99,2.16)

0.0562

LLMPP (PFS)

180

2.52 (1.13,5.64)

0.0237

180

1.37 (0.68,2.74)

0.375

MDFCI (OS)

63

4.05 (1.13,14.51)

0.0318

63

0.84 (0.25,2.76)

0.769

REGS predictor (univariate)

IDRC (PFS)

470

1.11 (1.04,1.17)

0.000572

470

1.07 (1.01,1.13)

0.0131

LLMPP (PFS)

220

1.10 (1.00,1.20)

0.0438

220

1.09 (0.99,1.19)

0.0794

MDFCI (OS)

67

1.32 (1.14,1.54)

0.000318

67

0.96 (0.83,1.12)

0.63

REGS predictor (adjusted for IPI)

IDRC (PFS)

424

1.09 (1.03,1.16)

0.00595

424

1.05 (1.00,1.11)

0.0733

LLMPP (PFS)

180

1.11 (1.00,1.23)

0.0433

180

1.04 (0.94,1.15)

0.467

MDFCI (OS)

63

1.34 (1.15,1.57)

0.000237

63

0.95 (0.83,1.07)

0.387

  1. In the multivariate analysis the Cox proportional hazards regression is adjusted for IPI. The estimated HR’s compare patients classified as resistant to patients classified as sensitive.