Author, year (location) | Main area based measure/contrast | Stratification variable | Age-adjusted rates per 100,000 | Ratio measures | P-value Trend |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income | |||||
[26]Blot, 1977 (United States) | High income vs. low income | Northeast, <10,000 | a 25.2 vs. 24.1 | Â | Â |
South, <10,000 | a 18.0 vs. 16.2 | b Rate Ratio: 1.05 | Â | ||
Central, <10,000 | a 22.0 vs. 20.9 | b Rate Ratio: 1.11 | Â | ||
West, <10,000 | a 20.7 vs. 20.3 | b Rate Ratio: 1.05 | Â | ||
Northeast, 250,000+ | a 30.2 vs.28.1 | b Rate Ratio: 0.99 | Â | ||
South, 250,000+ | a 25.1 vs. 22.9 | b Rate Ratio: 1.07 | Â | ||
Central, 250,000+ | a 28.6 vs. 26.4 | b Rate Ratio: 1.08 | Â | ||
West, 250,000+ | a 26.8 vs. 23.6 | b Rate Ratio: 1.14 | Â | ||
Poverty | |||||
[4]Harper, 2009 (United States) | Highest vs. lowest SES | Year of death: 1987 | 85.1 vs. 102.7 | b 0.83 | Â |
Year of death: 2004 | 76.3 vs. 74.4 | b 1.02 | |||
Composite SES | |||||
[23]Williams, 1991 (Australia) | Highest vs. lowest SES | Â | a 68 vs. 57 | b Rate Ratio: 1.19 | Â |
[22]Pollock, 1997 (United Kingdom) | Highest vs. lowest SES |  | SMR: 99 (84–116) vs. 111 (93–132) | b Rate Ratio: 0.89 |  |
[38]Panczak, 2012 (Switzerland) | Lowest vs. highest SES | Â | Â | c Hazard Ratio: 0.96 (0.87-1.05) | 0.826 |
Urbanization | |||||
[29]Dobson, 2010 (Australia) | Remote vs. major urban centers | Â | Â | d Hazard Ratio: 0.47 (0.06-3.42) | Â |
[36]Markossian, 2012 (United States) | Rural vs. urban | Â | Â | e Hazard Ratio: 1.04 (0.85-1.26) | 0.748 |