|
Treatments
|
---|
OC
|
OC + Mel
|
OC + EtOH
|
OC + EtOH + Mel
|
---|
TLR2
|
+
|
++
|
+
|
0
|
TLR4
|
+++
|
+
|
+++
|
++
|
MyD88
|
++
|
0
|
++
|
+
|
IKK-α
|
+
|
0
|
++
|
++
|
IkBα
|
++/+++
|
0/+
|
++/+++
|
0/+
|
NFkB p65
|
+++
|
0/+
|
+++
|
++
|
TRAF6
|
++
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
TRIF
|
+/++
|
+
|
+/++
|
+
|
IRF3
|
+++
|
++
|
+++
|
++/+++
|
- OC staining were interpreted by pathologist visual scoring as 0 (no staining), + (<10% of carcinoma staining), ++ (10-50% of carcinoma staining), or +++ (>50% of carcinoma staining). N = 10 animals/group. Five selected OC sections were analyzed per animal.