Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The presence of postmenopausal bleeding as prognostic parameter in patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective multi-center study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Feb 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
5 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Epstein
1 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mandira Ray
3 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Veronika Seebacher
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Epstein
28 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adrian Boyle
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adrian Boyle
26 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Veronika Seebacher
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 Dec 2009 Editorially accepted
22 Dec 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-9-460

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement