Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of 5 randomized trials comparing gemcitabine to gemcitabine plus platinum analog

From: Meta-analysis of randomized trials: evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer

Reference

Year

n

Treatment regimen

Stage IV (%)

Male (%)

PS 0–1 (%)

Louvet

2005

156

Gem 1000 mg/m2 for 7 of 8 wks, then wkly for 3 of 4 wks

70

53

82

  

157

Gem 1000 mg/m2/100 min d1 (FDR) + Oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 d2 q 2 wks

68

60

83

Poplin

2006

279

Gem 1000 mg/m2 for 7 of 8 wks, then wkly for 3 of 4 wks (standard)

88

56

88

  

277

Gem 1500 mg/m2/150 min q wk × 3 of 4 wks (FDR)

 

58

 
  

276

Gem 1000 mg/m2/100 min d1 (FDR) + Oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 d2 q 2 wks

 

46

 

Heinemann

2006

97

Gem 1000 mg/m2 for 3 of 4 wks

79

62

49*

  

98

Gem 1000 mg/m2 + Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 q 2 wks

80

65

56*

Colucci

2002

54

Gem 1000 mg/m2 for 7 of 8 wks, then wkly for 3 of 4 wks

54

50

med. KPS 70

  

53

Gem 1000 mg/m2 + Cisplatin 25 mg/m2 for 6/7 wks

62

66

med. KPS 70

Viret

2004

41

Gem 1000 mg/m2 for 7 of 8 wks, then wkly for 3 of 4 wks

78

na

83

  

42

Gem 1000 mg/m2 d1, 8, 15 + Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 d15 q 4 wks

81

na

76

  1. * KPS = 90–100%; PS = performance status; FDR = fixed dose rate; na = data not available;