Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comprehensive analysis of NuMA variation in breast cancer

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Aug 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janet Hall
11 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Cox
19 Nov 2007 Author responded Author comments - Outi Kilpivaara
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Nov 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Nov 2007 Author responded Author comments - Outi Kilpivaara
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Nov 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Cox
14 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janet Hall
19 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Outi Kilpivaara
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Outi Kilpivaara
Resubmission - Version 6
5 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
10 Mar 2008 Editorially accepted
10 Mar 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-8-71

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement