Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: TP53 status and taxane-platinum versus platinum-based therapy in ovarian cancer patients: A non-randomized retrospective study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Jul 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gabriella Ferrandina
11 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - angiolo gadducci
4 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tiziano Maggino
12 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gabriella Ferrandina
13 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tiziano Maggino
16 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael MacLeod
23 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
29 Jan 2008 Editorially accepted
29 Jan 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2407-8-27

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement